• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Britain ahead of 17 other EU countries put together!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Does that include anyone who comes here to retire? What about children or non-working wives?
    Of course dependants go with the bread winner.

    Who would want to retire here? Even if they did, we have an aging population and can't take any more.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      Immigrants tend to be younger, healthy, working age people. Maybe ultimately they cost the overall economy taking into account what DaveB said, but if they're costing the overall economy less than the average Brit, then at least we're getting a bit closer to making the books balance.
      Erm, no, costing less is still a cost, and so the books will be further out.

      I understand what you're saying, and there are real and understandable concerns over our ageing population and our ability to provide a safety net to pensioners, but more immigration is not a panacea, it's just kicking the can down the road.

      Sooner or later our politicians will need to make hard decisions on things like state pensions, NHS, etc, and the public that are used to their handouts are not going to like it. And it'll be my kids and grandkids that end up paying for it.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by meridian View Post
        Erm, no, costing less is still a cost, and so the books will be further out.
        Maybe in pounds, but not as a proportion. The greater the proportion of the young, healthy, working you have vs the old, sick and useless, the better off you are. The only fly in the ointment is that young, healthy, working people tend to turn into old, sick and useless people, but that's more true of children and grandchildren as it is of immigrants as many immigrants may well work here and then retire back to their home country.

        So the answer is clear: increase immigration and ban people from having babies.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #34
          Logan's Run.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by meridian View Post
            Logan's Run.
            Indeed. Though I'm 43 and I haven't got to swim naked with Jenny Agutter yet. I'm not ready for Sanctuary.
            Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
              Maybe in pounds, but not as a proportion. The greater the proportion of the young, healthy, working you have vs the old, sick and useless, the better off you are. The only fly in the ointment is that young, healthy, working people tend to turn into old, sick and useless people, but that's more true of children and grandchildren as it is of immigrants as many immigrants may well work here and then retire back to their home country.

              So the answer is clear: increase immigration and ban people from having babies.
              It's quite interesting this - seems 'old people' now almost expect to live to 90-100

              where as back in the day they were all popping off at 75

              fact is once you get past 80 you are on the way down and never getting back to where you were - do the decent thing n pop eh?!

              Comment

              Working...
              X