• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Apparently there is a public sector strike going on...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    It is not a criminal offence for a worker to engage in a political strike, but legal protection against dismissal is no longer there, and IIRC there are legal sanctions against a Trade Union that organises such a strike.

    It would be interesting enough if an attempt to ban (in effect) public sector strikes was made, as it might be enough to stir an all out indefinite strike - legal or not, and then we'd see who wins.
    Privatisation
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
      Privatisation
      That's just a word you like that you've typed.

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
        have you ever heard of Margaret Thatcher?

        BBC NEWS | Politics | Enemies within: Thatcher and the unions

        We may need to dig her up.
        That's not really an answer to the question though. Do you think it can be legitimate to use striking as a manner of protest against such things as starting wars after lying to parliament about imminent threats? Or against handing powers to the EU?
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Does that mean that in DA's ideal world a public sector employee going on strike to protest against an illegal war could be done for two offences while a private sector employee could be done for only one?
          Which illegal war would that be?
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
            Which illegal war would that be?
            The Iraq war, which was a war of Aggression.

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              That's not really an answer to the question though. Do you think it can be legitimate to use striking as a manner of protest against such things as starting wars after lying to parliament about imminent threats? Or against handing powers to the EU?
              We have a democratic system and the courts to decide on these things. Abusing monopolistic power to make political points is an abuse of privilege.
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                The Iraq war, which was a war of Aggression.
                What court has decided this?
                Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                  Which illegal war would that be?
                  Iraq; effectively illegal due to Tony B Lyingtulip's fabrications in the house of commons.

                  No how about the handing powers to the EU part of the question? Would that be a legitimate cause for striking in your world?
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    We have a democratic system and the courts to decide on these things. Abusing monopolistic power to make political points is an abuse of privilege.
                    So you think the democratic system is fine as it is do you?

                    Including the EU parliament and the European Courts?
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      So you think the democratic system is fine as it is do you?

                      Including the EU parliament and the European Courts?
                      No it is not fine, but it is the best there is. It should always be under review and continually improved. it should not be manipulated by public sector employees who wish to use their monopolistic positions to pursue their own agendas.
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X