- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Renegotiate rate after verbal agreement and start
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Wanderer View PostNope. I know a small agency which operates on a fixed margin with certain clients and it's pretty low too - about 7-10%....Comment
-
Originally posted by Antman View PostThey would say that though, wouldn't they.Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Originally posted by Wanderer View PostYep, they would! But the clients told me the same thing and showed me the purchase orders so I was inclined to believe them....Comment
-
Originally posted by DirtyDog View PostSo what answer will you give when the agency / client ask why the previous role was only two months when the norm for whatever you do is longer than that?
I decided against leaving after 2 months (that would have been the end of April).
The contract is scheduled to last until the end of May.Last edited by a27; 15 May 2014, 15:05.Comment
-
During my contract, the department head moved to a new job in a different organisation.
The current head is also a contractor. We had a first meeting in April when he said there would not be an extension but there was the possibility of a permanent job.
I politely declined the permanent role and we agreed that I'd see out my contract and move on amicably.
About a week into May (3 weeks left in the contract), he asked if I had a new contract lined up from June and offered a 1 month extension. Either way, he wanted a decision by the end of this week.
As it was going to be via the agency, I told him that I'd be okay to stay but would be seeking a raise from the agency.
Agency phoned me a few minutes later and I ignored their call. They left a voicemail message and sent me an email with the same content: extension on offer.
I replied to the email the next day, asking what the rate was.
As expected, agency replied "Same rate as before" (220).
I said "I can't accept that unfortunately".
Agency said "OK. Let me know what you want and I'll see what we can do"
I anted 250. I asked for 260.
They said, "Out of the goodness of our hearts, we'll give you another £20 from our margin" (240).
I said "Thanks but it'd have to be at least £30" (250).
Then they phoned me and said, "The £20 is as a gesture and to honour the fact that you're completing your contract. It's from our margin. If we give you £30, we'll be losing money so we'd have to ask the client."
I know this is not true as they currently charge 280 for my 220.
I said "Thanks but "No, thanks"."
I heard nothing back from them that day. Perhaps they were seeing if I came back and accepted £240 (this I believe). Perhaps they were asking the client for a raise (I don't believe this).
Anyway, they called me the next day and said "We'll give you £20 and the client will do £10, so you can have £250 for the extension."
I said "OK. Then."
The new contract has not been sent yet. We only have a verbal agreement.
My approach to this was that I'd be okay either way. I was prepared to walk. Partly because I know that I can earn more than £250 (especially with a bit of private sector experience) and partly because I'd quite like to be home to watch the FIFA World Cup (starts 12 June).
The games are at 1700, 2000, 2100, 2300 and 0200. Outside work hours but during sleep time.
Now, I'll have to see if I can work from home. That way, the time spent commuting can be spent working so I can watch the games and get enough sleep.Comment
-
Originally posted by a27 View PostHey,
I decided against leaving after 2 months (that would have been the end of April).
The contract is scheduled to last until the end of March.Comment
-
Originally posted by GB9 View PostIf you tell us what you do we can give an opinion on what the average rate is.
Depending on what you do, I would suck it for the contract duration at which point you have the private sector experience and can maybe get something better.
I see roles for £400 (usually London and financial) but agencies don't put me forward for lack of "Financial services experience".
Other times roles are in London and they think "You're too far". In that regard, it helps that I've worked in Norfolk and lived there for the duration of the contract.
Then some agencies look at my CV and say "Public sector...Education" and don't want to put me forward for roles outside those sectors.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyShould have asked for 270, when they came back with 250 you should have said deal as long as I can WFH three days a week.
TBH at 220 a day they should let you do whatever the hell you want, they are only paying you for half days anyway.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment