Originally posted by DirtyDog
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What to do??
Collapse
X
-
Maybe they were overly eager in their redundancies? Happened to me a while back in permieland, got laid off, then asked back because they found they still needed people. "Sorry, too late" was my reply, but a couple of others went back. -
Presumably those that went back paid tax on their redundancy pay, then, since they weren't being made redundant.Originally posted by riffpie View PostMaybe they were overly eager in their redundancies? Happened to me a while back in permieland, got laid off, then asked back because they found they still needed people. "Sorry, too late" was my reply, but a couple of others went back.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.Comment
-
Yep thats exactly what has happened. Anyway will go in for a chat next week. Curious what they will offer me. Suit me to work from home now as wife gone back full time. We will see!!
Originally posted by riffpie View PostMaybe they were overly eager in their redundancies? Happened to me a while back in permieland, got laid off, then asked back because they found they still needed people. "Sorry, too late" was my reply, but a couple of others went back.Comment
-
Good point. Not thought about that. It will be a question that I will ask. Thanks
Originally posted by DirtyDog View PostPresumably those that went back paid tax on their redundancy pay, then, since they weren't being made redundant.Comment
-
I have no idea, tbh. Never occurred to me.Originally posted by DirtyDog View PostPresumably those that went back paid tax on their redundancy pay, then, since they weren't being made redundant.Comment
-
Go back on your terms, forget what you used to get paid, find out the contract market rate and pitch at the top-end of this (they asked you, you know everything about the place and can be productive very quickly).
If the job fits with wfh, have no qualms about suggesting a 50/50 split of on-site and off.
etc etc.
Forget sole-trader etc, thats all details, find out if you want the job and how much it pays/conditions e.g. 3 days.
If you want it, propose what you want to go back and they can make a decision on that basis, you arent desperate to go back so can be relaxed if they decline.
Youve got all the good cards, make sure you use them...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Today 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Yesterday 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03

Comment