Originally posted by stek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agent gone bust
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
180K is what the agency get, if we are talking contracts then there is the cost of running the business, the factoring, and interest. Then factor in just one of your clients going tits up and owing you say 6 months money on just one contract which you have paid out.....your £180K is looking pretty sick at that stage The consultant running you would get roughly 40% in total ( thats the model across IT Recruitment if you pay more the 40% you will go bust simple as that ). And like I say that is simply not the average across the industry its more like £110K ( these are published figures ) as to average margin at 16% that just is not the case, if it was you would not have so many agencies going to the wall. -
Comment
-
Factoring couldn't have been an issue since Pendragon mostly didn't factor payments, they had a policy of only paying contractors once they had received money from the ClientCo.
In the 2008 accounts it shows they managed to minimise interest charges by paying off £1m of debt, then maximised funds owed to trade creditors (contractors) by the same amount... meaning they offset their own loans by retaining money owed to contractors.
It's really no wonder payments stopped.
Fack, Allen, Holden etc managed to take £180,000 in emoluments the same year, up a whooping 600% on the year before. M D C Allen owed £66,240 in linterest free loans, M B Fack owed £17,923.
Wonder how well they are operating the new company?Comment
-
Actually I have a limited company because agents will not contract with me otherwise. Not so that other people's money can stick to my fingers and then I can go bust and get away with not paying it back.Originally posted by tim123 View PostOnly if they can be shown to have traded whilst insolvent. They have a limited company for exactly the same reason you do.
timStep outside posh boyComment
-
Which for any sensible contractor is a huge red flag to start looking for a new contract as agency has serious cash/credit flow issues and can go bust any minute (plus you are letting them get their margin for doing pretty much nothing)Originally posted by 0mega View PostFactoring couldn't have been an issue since Pendragon mostly didn't factor payments, they had a policy of only paying contractors once they had received money from the ClientCo.Comment
-
Pendragon do like to browse through articles here on the forum
So I would like to wish them all a very happy Christmas, from all your loyal contractors.
Comment
-
Indeed, a Merry Christmas to Maxine and Rob et al.
May they receive many presents - inserted anally.
I'm sure many contractors are thinking of them over this festive period.Comment
-
Yes indeed, many contractors will be thinking of Pendragon as we tuck into our Tesco Value turkey breast on Christmas Day.
As for the creditors meeting held on Tues 15th Dec, a collective effort by those owed money meant that our proposed liquidator was appointed and not the choice of the directors of Pendragon Information Systems Ltd.
We still won't get our money back but it'll make for an uncomfortable few weeks/months for the directors especially if there's a hint of wrongful trading. If they thought they could get their own man in, wrap things up quickly and get on with trading under a new company then they certainly underestimated many of the creditors.
Merry ChristmasComment
-
Well done!Originally posted by Town64 View PostAs for the creditors meeting held on Tues 15th Dec, a collective effort by those owed money meant that our proposed liquidator was appointed and not the choice of the directors of Pendragon Information Systems Ltd.
We still won't get our money back but it'll make for an uncomfortable few weeks/months for the directors especially if there's a hint of wrongful trading. If they thought they could get their own man in, wrap things up quickly and get on with trading under a new company then they certainly underestimated many of the creditors.
Indeed, have a Merry Christmas despite the buggers.
My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.Comment
-
Indeed, as a mere foot soldier in the fight against Pendragon, praise certainly needs to be heaped upon those certain few creditors whose battle to see justice more then compensation is much appreciated by the majority of us who are owed in total around £955kOriginally posted by RichardCranium View PostWell done!
Last edited by Town64; 22 December 2009, 14:56.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment