I know of an agency that don't charge "rake off" if their contractors are offered perm with the client.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Direct Contracting
Collapse
X
-
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
C.S. Lewis -
Nice to see some thinking out the box by agencies but few comments
* You don't make it clear if you intend to offer this at contract start or at any point during the contract. If it's only at contract start don't expect a very large uptake as contractor/client don't "know" each other well enough yet to merit risk of such an outlay, besides if they (client) were going to do this at contract start might as well advertise the position themselves from start and save themselves even more money
* "Buy out" option should be offered to both sides, thus he who takes the risk can either save money (client) or make more (contractor)
* £1000 is too cheap in most cases I would say, better to work on some type of ratio, aka your margin for 3 months + 10% = buy out cost. (you need to make your money as well...god never thought i would say that to an agency)
* Before buyout occurs all parties must agree and existing contract T&C's would need to be revealed (seen contracts between client/agency that are not only different than the one between contractor/agency but actually contradictory), without some serious negotiation the party not performing the buy out would not want their T&C's changedLast edited by Not So Wise; 8 April 2009, 09:41.Comment
-
seen it also here at this IT Recruitment agency. exactly what you are saying I think - direct contracting and less agency fees.Comment
-
Well thanks for all of your feedback.
We've now moved ahead with the idea and the new website can be found at Contract Recruitment, with a flat fee of £2000 (or £500 a month for short term contracts).
We're already getting enquiries so fingers crossed.
Any further thoughts appreciated.
Thanks againComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Today 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Yesterday 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12

Comment