Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who has actually used the substitute clause? Especially in banks
Collapse
X
-
No, he thinks you should read a post properly before commenting on it. -
I brought this up with qdos for an SC cleared role for the MoD a few years ago. I basically pointed out to them that although I could provide a subby the clearance and onboarding process would make it almost imposible to actually do it.Originally posted by billybiro View PostVirtually no-one as 99% of all substitution clauses in the contracts of IT Contractors are a sham. The most frequently used constraint is that of the client having the final say on the actual substitute used. Therefore, clients can simply reject any/all substitutes offered by the contractor's Ltd. for whatever reasons they desire, thus making the contractor's Ltd. having a "right of substitution" to be a sham since it effectively doesn't exist.
Real substitution clauses allow the contractor's Ltd. to be the final adjudicator on who the actual substitute may be. Of course, the contractor's Ltd. has to ensure that the substitute possesses the relevant skills for which the contractor's Ltd is responsible. However, such "genuine" substitution clauses in the contracts for one-man-band IT Contractors, and irrespective of the sector that the contractor is working in, are as rare as rocking horse sh*t!
They said as long as the client was willing to agree that they would have no objections should a suitable subby be supplied that they would be happy with it from an IR35 review standpoint.
I got the client to confirm this in writing, highlighting the onboarding process that the subby would have to go through etc.
In the end I did use this, I brought in a subby to cover an extended holiday I took in 2016, he had previous experience with the client and was still scheduled cleared so came in for the three weeks which I paid him for... When I got back the client offered him a position and he stayed another 6 months...
So I guess whether the clause is actually useful depends on the client.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment