Originally posted by Denny
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I have a contract but no work
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Lucy
I'm really worried about being shown the door if they realise I have absolutely nothing to do.
.
When another contractor became concerned about this he spoke to his TL, and recieved the following reply "If I have to give it to you to do I'll have to write an A4 page of instructuctions so I give it to my colleague X who I know knows exactly what I want doing and will do it quicker".
This went on for a good while until I was called into the managers office for what I presumed was a 'ticking off' and end of contract thank you. But the opposite happened "Would I like to renew?". When I said I would if there was work the manager sounded surprsied and said he'd investigate. A week or so later he came back saying "That's the way things are. Do you still want to renew?".
That said having gone into a permanent role which has required I build a position up for myself I have learnt that in many situations it's up to the individual to be proactive in finding work. Even in a contract position if you ask around there's always someone needing help who'd be glad to accept and if you use the undoubted social skills many a contractor has I'm sure idle time can be put to good use. Someone had to write Perl in their spare time after all!
Above don't sit doing nothing. It kills your morale and your much better off approaching your TL or line manager. Don't just assume they know what is going on. It will look better for you if act resposibly and maturely, just don't throw the dolly out of the pram.Comment
-
Originally posted by DennyThink black and white, not grey (because grey looks suspiciously like mud from where I'm sitting).Comment
-
Originally posted by DennyIf you look at the cases that have won IR35 you'll find, no doubt, that they do actually operate as real businesses or meet many of the criteria laid down by the Revenue. Out of the cases that have lost, and I've read a few, they all work like you describe above.
It seems like you're doomed to chant the mantra 'I'm IR35 exempt but only because there's a good chance I'll get away with it.' That's hardly the same as actually having an IR35 exempt commercial relationship and potentially through the tedium and frustration of being invested with an eventual happy ending.
If I was an IT contractor working on site all day every day for set hours and client control with no real right of sub and implied MOO, then I would personally conduct all my tax affairs through a safe brolly, make the most of legit dispensaations, invest my PAYE earnings well and have done with it. At the same time I would also ensure that the EB contract gives a robust amount of protection from being screwed by the client or agency by remaining opted in.
You do yourself no favours at all by conjuring up IR35 friendly contracts, paying a fortune for B&C to screw you for contract review costs that mean nothing in practice, forking out for IR35 insurance (that surely won't pay up anyway if the commercial relationship wasn't properly tested in the first place), looking over your shoulder for the IR knock at the door, and giving the EB the freedom to screw you for payment or too many restrictions on trade, or the client to give you the right to terminate without notice. I would be looking at 28 days each way.
Think black and white, not grey (because grey looks suspiciously like mud from where I'm sitting).
If the PCG figures are correct then the vast majority of cases have been won ( and many repelled at NI investigation stage ) and I am sure by IR35 proofing your contract as best you can you are helping your cause.Comment
-
Originally posted by rootsnallI am making sure I have enough money in the bank to cough up in a worst case scenario and trying not to fret about the knock at the door. I have personally decided that is better than going the umbrella route and coughing up in advance.Comment
-
Originally posted by VectraManThere's a chance we'll be screwed down the line, but the evidence of the PCG cases (actually 1,405 to 3) suggests it's extremely unlikely.
Anyway, as far as I'm concerned I want to work in the way he suggests, and I want to be my own boss and work much like a plumber would. Not just for IR35 but because I'm fed up working for employers and corporates and having restrictions on how I do my job. The problem is if I just go out there and apply for contracts I won't necessarily get what I want. If I build up a reputation with clients then maybe I can negotiate what I want, but at the moment I'm just starting out and I don't have that option.
Oh, and would it be worth winding up the business every few years if you wanted to avoid back-tax? (I've heard that suggested before but not sure what the benefit of doing so is).Last edited by DeadKenny; 29 November 2006, 12:56.Comment
-
IT isn't plumbing though, and since when does working like a plumber define whether you run your own business or not?Comment
-
Originally posted by DennyIf you look at the cases that have won IR35 you'll find, no doubt, that they do actually operate as real businesses or meet many of the criteria laid down by the Revenue. Out of the cases that have lost, and I've read a few, they all work like you describe above.
It's all well and good the PCG (and others) going on about their success record against the IR, and people using this statistics to make statements that "any fool can avoid IR by changing their working practices"[1], but this is meaningless if we don't know how many people have been told "you haven't a chance, pay up". Of course, "business confidentiality reasons forbid us from telling you this latter figure".
I'm like VM. I do development, as part of a team.
I'm required to be at the client's site to do this, because I need access to hardware that it is impractical to have at home or access remotely.
And the manager needs me personally to complete the work, because (as I've said before) after the first few weeks, the most important thing that need to do the job *today*, is the accumulated knowledge of the software that has been written by the rest of the team whilst I have been working with them. The idea that someone could come in and represent me next Wendesday, and produce anything close to the same amount of output that I could, is complete bollux. Even if the contract says that I can sub, no manager is going to allow it.
So, how do I get out of IR35? (I'm not saying that it's impossible, I just don't believe it's as easy as, "1000s of other have")
[1] I'm reminded of the FAQ for a respected US contractors BB saying:
1) To be a computer contractor you MUST have <whatever that MS Certification thingy is>. Not all Computer Contractors do the same job and fit the same mold.
timComment
-
Originally posted by XperTestIT isn't plumbing though, and since when does working like a plumber define whether you run your own business or not?
Yes, I can't say it's helpful to compare ourselves with "hairy arsed plumbers, or builders" for that matter. A lot of us provide 'professional services' along the lines of KPMG, and working alongside them I see they have specific hours, need to be in the workplace, answer to a manager. I know they aren't independent contractors, but they certainly are a more valid comparison in some cases.
And anyway, I am sure if I asked a builder, plumber <insert hairy arsed tradesman here> to turn up at my house and wait around while I decided what they have to do they would still be sending me a bill at the end of the day.Comment
-
Originally posted by rootsnallI think 'grey' is working fine for a large number of contractors including myself. Virtually every contractor I know is effectively as you put it "working on site all day every day for set hours and client control with no real right of sub and implied MOO", and most of them I would hope realise that is the situation. I am making sure I have enough money in the bank to cough up in a worst case scenario and trying not to fret about the knock at the door. I have personally decided that is better than going the umbrella route and coughing up in advance.
If the PCG figures are correct then the vast majority of cases have been won ( and many repelled at NI investigation stage ) and I am sure by IR35 proofing your contract as best you can you are helping your cause.
However, I still think the coughing up in advance option could work for many IT contractors. Apparently, if you do pay inside IR35, not knowing what your working conditions are, and then discover that you are outside after the contract starts, so that you can better ascertain what your working terms are in practice, you can claim the difference back. I assume however that you would need to be a limited co rather than go brolly.
Surely this is a safer option than not paying and then being clobbered further on down the road which could mean not just paying the tax owing, but also the investigation costs as well as any tax interest and surcharges added, which could be quite steep. As I mentioned before, the insurance to cover IR35 investigations and tax owing will only be useful to you if you can demonstrate that you were clearly duped in advance of what the commercial relationship was. If this was not tested before going on site, I doubt they would pay up.
All this debate is demonstating is how difficult it is to be a contractor in IT, or any sort of contracting for that matter, working in these 'grey' conditions. It's grossly unfair for any contractor to worry about all of this nonsense. However, please assume that I am being helpful, not a hinderance hell bent on trying to scare the tulip out of all of you for my own personal gratification. I am certainly not doing that. I, along with all of you, believe that the whole concept of IR35 is highly flawed and unconvincing. But I am a realist not an idealist, and use the IR criteria for working as a real business as my reference point, not the working conditions the client expects from IT contractors most of the time along with the advice given by contact reviewers who are, let's face it, on a money grasping roll with no notion of how the contract will pan out in practice. Unless they know this, their advice is pretty useless and won't help you very much.
I sometimes read the responses to my posts about this subject, and can't help feeling that most of you could well be living in cloud cuckoo land by shoring up problems for yourselves later on.
Let's hope I'm wrong.Last edited by Denny; 29 November 2006, 19:21.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment