Originally posted by unixman
View Post
Yes, managing staff is an onerous task. I don't manage the staff. Below me is a manager, who I manage, but day-to-day management is the responsibility of the manager. We do annual performance reviews, have a small HR system, the lot. Basically, I'm ticking boxes here so that in the event that I need to get rid of someone, it's a piece of piss. Managing sickness is the hardest for me - I never get sick, so it's difficult dealing with some staff who have a fair bit of sickness, but that's life.
The advantage of hiring someone I knew first of all, is that I trusted her to WFH, and we'd meet occasionally. This enabled us to grow and expand to the point where we wanted/needed a third person which necessitated an office. I definitely wouldn't have gone with someone I didn't know as my first employee.
Originally posted by unixman
View Post
Thirdly, I went for a contract interview for a daily rate job. Didn't say anything to the agent about my intentions, but agreed a daily rate, and the client flew me out for two days in Germany to work with them to put together an action plan. Whilst there, I explained how we could do it fixed price, with payment at various milestones. I estimated the amount of work hours each task would take, and used the daily rate to come up with a fixed price approach. They were impressed, as they were getting the work done at a fraction of the cost of hiring me every day - plus if they delayed the project, they wouldn't have to pay me daily rate while the delay was occurring. And it meant I could do that on the side and get more business in. We then told the agency what was happening, and the agency basically did what the client told them to, and I invoiced the agency what I agreed with the client at each milestone, and the agency in turn invoiced plus their mark-up.
So a combination of specialising in the right technologies, and getting clients and agents to agree to this. I always emphasised how the client could save money with this approach, and it's rare that they were like "oh, it's OK thanks, we'd rather spunk a load of cash on having your ass on a seat". One or two potential clients did, but not many.
Contractors vs Permies for your business:
Just one extra point. I went for permie staff for my business as opposed to outsourcing work to contractors when I was over capacity, simply because I believe that a lot of contractors are quite business-minded, and frankly, I didn't want to expose my IP to contractors who might use it for their own business - particularly if they had a wider network than me, as they could take my work, and go and do the business generation better than me, then I'd lose out! I wanted permies who had a permie mindset and were interested in a career, etc, rather than people who'd charge a high premium and potentially go away and run this business better than I could!!
Comment