• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by mrkitchen View Post
    Application to ECHR, any news on this, the last I heard with had applied within the time limit.
    It could take up to a year for the court to even consider the application.

    Assuming it meets the eligibility criteria then it could be several more years before anything further happens.

    The current average length of cases in the ECtHR is 7 years.

    Comment


      Originally posted by KNIGHTRK View Post
      The HMRC handbook seems to suggest that there is an "enforcement limit" on NI but not Income Tax. Therefore I don't think HMRC can chase NI debt that is older than 6 years. That might save us some cash if this proves to be true.

      DMBM595080 - Pre-enforcement: limits in enforcement proceedings: limitation legislation
      The 6 years starts from when the debt becomes enforceable.

      However, NIC will be up for grabs at a tribunal anyway because there are technical arguments as to why it shouldn't even apply.

      Comment


        Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
        The 6 years starts from when the debt becomes enforceable.

        However, NIC will be up for grabs at a tribunal anyway because there are technical arguments as to why it shouldn't even apply.
        We all know the trouble taxpayers can get into making dubious claims on SARs. I assume that claiming NICs on all our CNs was a minor error by HMRC on a very wide scale then, rather than the more obvious criminal act of attempted fraud, or potentially actual if anyone paid up?

        Would such a determination force cancellation of all CNs, plus payment of damages?
        Last edited by Emigre; 8 October 2012, 12:33.
        Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
        "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

        Comment


          Originally posted by Emigre View Post
          We all know the trouble taxpayers can get into making dubious claims on SARs. I assume that claiming NICs on all our CNs was a minor error by HMRC on a very wide scale then, rather than the more obvious criminal act of attempted fraud, or potentially actual if anyone paid up?

          Would such a determination force cancellation of all CNs, plus payment of damages?
          Its all soooo quiet

          Comment


            Originally posted by smalldog View Post
            Its all soooo quiet
            No news is good news.

            Resuming radio silence.

            Over and out.

            Comment


              it is quiet

              Might be down to conference season.

              I'm presuming/expecting that things are progressing along in the background.

              Would be nice for MP to come out and say where they are up - haven't heard from them in ages.

              Comment


                Tax Avoidance debate

                Previously in this thread I saw a link to the text version of the debate in the House of Commons on 13th September, but don't recall seeing a link to the video.

                In case it hasn't been posted before, here is a link to the movie. For his fans, David Gauke starts speaking 1 hour 55 minutes and 30 seconds into the debate.

                BBC - Democracy Live - MP condemns 'cancer' of tax avoidance in debate

                Comment


                  Vodaphone's retrospective Indian tax bill

                  "The Times" reports today that:

                  'India should drop new laws designed to tax foreign acquisitions in the country retrospectively, according to a government-appointed committee set up to study the issue — potentially letting Vodafone off the hook in a multibillion-dollar tax dispute.
                  The panel’s draft report said that retrospective tax demands should be made only in the “rarest of rare cases”...'


                  No doubt George Osborne will applaud this proposal to reverse retrospective tax laws!

                  Comment


                    Just checking in too.

                    I'm still here too - clicking Refresh quietly in the background.

                    Comment


                      Still on the case

                      DR and another of the NTRT team are taking well earned vacations. Lots still going on and gearing up for another Parliamentary campaign now the Conference season is over. More news next week. We are still looking for more people who have had any of the following:
                      • SARs accepted by HMRC for years where DTA claim was made;
                      • Enquiries opened for years where DTA claim was made and HMRC closed enquiry with no amendment to SAR required
                      • Enquiries opened more than 12 months after SAR was submitted or for earlier years later than 31 January of the following year.
                      We have examples of all of the above, but the more we have, the less easy it is for HMRC to claim they were mistakes. If you are in one of the situations outlined please contact Whitehouse. No information provided will be used without your permission. Thank you
                      Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                      "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X