• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Court of Appeal and beyond

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Only if making stuff up as you go along to get it onto Statute so you can bankrupt a load of people is deemed outside of HR and that such matters don't have any wider impact beyond our shores (or India or....)

    Comment


      A book deal

      Someone suggested to me that this whole sorry affair would make for a rather good fiction novel. It might run to a few thousand pages to cover 21 years though. Or not maybe. After all you can cover the period from 1987 to 2007 with "just watching the game, having a Bud" then the final Chapter can be called "Wazzzzup!".

      There could even be a good name for the book "BN66 - The Pad-it out-more Legislation"

      Might gross (before tax) about 400 million quid which could help...

      Comment


        Originally posted by Tax_shouldnt_be_taxing View Post
        Might gross (before tax) about 400 million quid which could help...
        I know a good legal and transparent tax scheme...
        Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
        "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

        Comment


          Late October 2007

          If anyone received a letter from HMRC in this period asking them if you would be prepared to await the decision of the Commissioners to settle your enquiry please PM me. Please also let me have the name of the HMRC officer on the letter. I'm most interested in dates after 20th October 2007.

          Alternatively, our friends at HMRC could just PM me the count as they know what they sent and when. They could even add 'why' to the reply...

          Comment


            Originally posted by Tax_shouldnt_be_taxing View Post
            If anyone received a letter from HMRC in this period asking them if you would be prepared to await the decision of the Commissioners to settle your enquiry please PM me. Please also let me have the name of the HMRC officer on the letter. I'm most interested in dates after 20th October 2007.

            Alternatively, our friends at HMRC could just PM me the count as they know what they sent and when. They could even add 'why' to the reply...
            PM SleepingFireman in this thread http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...eyond-333.html

            He reckons he had such a letter.
            I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

            Comment


              Reply from my MP

              I finally got a reply, after over a month, that he would be asking the Chancellor of my concerns.

              This is good as lately most people got reply from DG so it should be interesting to get a reply from GO. However, I want to write to my MP to also consider GO's double stance on telling Indian Govmt not to use 'clarification' and go 'retrospective' whereas he is doing exactly the same at home!

              Can someone give me pointers on exactly how/what to write to my MP, please? I think it needs to be a very brief as they do not have good concentration span! May be someone can PM me.

              Thanks

              Comment


                Originally posted by marcuss View Post
                I finally got a reply, after over a month, that he would be asking the Chancellor of my concerns.

                This is good as lately most people got reply from DG so it should be interesting to get a reply from GO. However, I want to write to my MP to also consider GO's double stance on telling Indian Govmt not to use 'clarification' and go 'retrospective' whereas he is doing exactly the same at home!

                Can someone give me pointers on exactly how/what to write to my MP, please? I think it needs to be a very brief as they do not have good concentration span! May be someone can PM me.

                Thanks
                We have had the standard response from GO also. This would be a good opportunity to pre-empt the reply by letting them know when you were first told Hmrc did not accept the scheme working and asked you to make a payment (may 2007 maybe?) and that the first time Padmore was sighted as a reason was March 2008.
                http://notoretrotax.org.uk/

                Comment


                  Hold fire

                  Before sending any further correspondence to your MP on this, please hold fire for a few days. A lot of feedback can be distilled into a condensed and focussed next step.

                  Comment


                    question re MPs

                    i have written to my MP at the start of March.... and followed up when he didn't respond in a couple of weeks.....and still no response.....even though he tweets regularly every day....

                    question .. do they have to respond to a constituent? (+6 weeks)


                    cheers

                    fj

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by funjim View Post
                      i have written to my MP at the start of March.... and followed up when he didn't respond in a couple of weeks.....and still no response.....even though he tweets regularly every day....

                      question .. do they have to respond to a constituent? (+6 weeks)


                      cheers

                      fj
                      If they have a caseworker, it's probably best to follow up with them. And better still to arrange a face to face with your MP at their Surgery. However, I'd hang on for a day or so and see what can be done to support you with your MP. After all, one thing ultimately is for sure, they cannot ignore you. But I do have consideration for their workloads. I know as fact that even when they really want to keep you up to date, it's not as simple as a quick BB reply from them to you. So if after a couple of weeks you have zero, then a message to their caseworker if they have one and failing that then an email to arrange a meeting at their surgery. I suggest that you ask for more than the default of 15 minutes. But as I suggest, let the weekend come and go and then we can all re-group as how best to address the MP issue.

                      Should have added: Would you want to respond to the most awkward set of points ever put before you out of choice?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X