for the first time I am seriously thinking of leaving this god foresaken country. Not running away from our situation I just have had enough of governments trying to screw you for every last penny. Its just going to get worse....maybe if these governments thought a little bit more about trying to invest in industry or protect what we have to get some kind of GDP once more there wouldnt be such an emphasis on taxing everyone and their dog.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Is the UK starting to wake up to the implications of blurring together avoidance and evasion at last? I hope so:
BBC - Peston's PicksComment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View Postfor the first time I am seriously thinking of leaving this god foresaken country. Not running away from our situation I just have had enough of governments trying to screw you for every last penny. Its just going to get worse....maybe if these governments thought a little bit more about trying to invest in industry or protect what we have to get some kind of GDP once more there wouldnt be such an emphasis on taxing everyone and their dog.
Maybe the government have forgotten that we all have the right to choose where to live and I for one am tired of flogging my guts out for HMRC to then come along and use any underhand tactics they see fit to screw as much from me as possible!! Coupled with the uncertainty brought about by retrospective legislation the UK is no longer somewhere I can be happy so why would I want to stay here??
Regardless of the outcome of our legal challenge I am no longer willing to fund these thieving, lying, ba**trds, as far as I’m concerned they can go f**k themselves – I’m off to contribute to a fair society instead!!!
Can the last one out please switch off the lights!!
Comment
-
Danny says tax evasion is "morally indefensible"
And here's me thinking it was illegal.
So, if you are thinking of legging it abroad, remember this would be morally indefensible.
BBC News - Alexander launches 'ruthless' tax evasion clampdown
"Tax avoidance and evasion are unacceptable in the best of times but in today's circumstances it is morally indefensible."Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAnd here's me thinking it was illegal.
So, if you are thinking of legging it abroad, remember this would be morally indefensible.
BBC News - Alexander launches 'ruthless' tax evasion clampdown
"Tax avoidance and evasion are unacceptable in the best of times but in today's circumstances it is morally indefensible."Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostI think keeping tax payers waiting 7 years for you to act is morally indefensible, its tantamount to torture!Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAnd here's me thinking it was illegal.
So, if you are thinking of legging it abroad, remember this would be morally indefensible.
BBC News - Alexander launches 'ruthless' tax evasion clampdown
"Tax avoidance and evasion are unacceptable in the best of times but in today's circumstances it is morally indefensible."
When they grow up they will realise that a) the only real way to avoid "unintended" tax avoidance is to eliminate the incentive to avoid, ie reduce taxes; b) that tax avoidance is a factor of an over complicated tax system that would takes decades to revisit, and c) that if you try to clamp down on 'unintended' tax avoidance you risk tampering with the tax breaks that drive the economy, eg low capital gains/ corporation tax rates as incentives to incorporate, grow ones business; ISAs/pensions as an incentive to save and so on. In short, tax avoidance is, for want of a better word, good.
Frankly it's pathetic.Last edited by TheBarCapBoyz; 20 September 2010, 15:45.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBarCapBoyz View PostI wouldn't worry too much about these comedians. We have an extremely naive party, wet behind the ears and all that, tasting power for the first time in 60 years, gobbing off about tax avoidance in order to appease the grumpy left of the party.
When they grow up they will realise that a) the only real way to avoid "unintended" tax avoidance is to eliminate the incentive to avoid, ie reduce taxes; b) that tax avoidance is a factor of an over complicated tax system that would takes decades to revisit, and c) that if you try to clamp down on 'unintended' tax avoidance you risk tampering with the tax breaks that drive the economy, eg low capital gains/ corporation tax rates as incentives to incorporate, grow ones business; ISAs/pensions as an incentive to save and so on. In short, tax avoidance is, for want of a better word, good.
Frankly it's pathetic.
All you have to do is google lowering tax rates and you get a mass of economists etc all saying the same thing, heres one example:
"What happens," he wrote, "if we instead raise tax rates? Economists of all persuasions accept that a tax rate hike will reduce GNP, in which case Hauser's Law says it will also lower tax revenue."
So here's the bottom line: Hauser's Law shows that the only way that politicians can increase government revenue significantly is to increase economic growth significantly. And the most effective way they can do that is to lower tax rates significantly.
Everyones known about this for years, but our beloved benefit claimants will see it as HMG siding with the rich, then Labour will crucify the govt and before you know it the new govt. has been voted out at the next election by all the dolies...vote buying again im affraid, trying to protect the electorate, nothing more.Last edited by smalldog; 20 September 2010, 15:58.Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View Posthear hear, the only reason people avoid paying something, is if its too expensive. Reduce tax rates and they would actually increase tax receipts. Its one of the most fundamental lessons of economics.
All you have to do is google lowering tax rates and you get a mass of economists etc all saying the same thing, heres one example:
"What happens," he wrote, "if we instead raise tax rates? Economists of all persuasions accept that a tax rate hike will reduce GNP, in which case Hauser's Law says it will also lower tax revenue."
So here's the bottom line: Hauser's Law shows that the only way that politicians can increase government revenue significantly is to increase economic growth significantly. And the most effective way they can do that is to lower tax rates significantly.
Everyones known about this for years, but our beloved benefit claimants will see it as HMG siding with the rich, then Labour will crucify the govt and before you know it the new govt. has been voted out at the next election by all the dolies...vote buying again im affraid, trying to protect the electorate, nothing more.
I liked Littlejohns article on this in the Mail... worth a read...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...taxpayers.htmlComment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostAnd here's me thinking it was illegal.
So, if you are thinking of legging it abroad, remember this would be morally indefensible.
BBC News - Alexander launches 'ruthless' tax evasion clampdown
"Tax avoidance and evasion are unacceptable in the best of times but in today's circumstances it is morally indefensible."'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Yesterday 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Dec 3 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Comment