BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)

[DonkeyRhubarb]

Do you think a suitable apology will be forthcoming?

Begrudging if you're lucky.

[moira under the stairs]

Do you think a suitable apology will be forthcoming?

I'll write to them tomorrow and say 'Sorry' but I'm still not paying

[TykeMerc]

Do you think a suitable apology will be forthcoming?

You're more likely to see unequivocal scientific evidence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster than an apology from HMRC.

[poppy01]

Has anyone else received a letter from the HMRC which starts off:

Nine out of ten UK citizens pay their Self Assessment tax on time, funding the public services that we benefit from…… etc etc

And that my case has been transferred to a HMRC office in Croyden to pursue the debt.

I will be forwarding to MP to deal with.

i got one of those last year. it was just a reminder to make my payment on account for the current year. nothing to do with mp

[swede]

i got one of those last year. it was just a reminder to make my payment on account for the current year. nothing to do with mp

I deliberately let them send me a couple of warning letters these days, just to get my moneys worth.

[Alan Jones]

Wrong Again

that's his fourth incarnation isn't it? (I'm including northernsouls 'chum')
is that quadpolar syndrome?

If i have something to say i will "stand up" and say it.

I am having to do a lot of research into the Huitson case to prepare for my own case in March (you are all invited).

I have come to the conclusion that Justice Parker was correct for one simple reason which (in my humble opinion) cannot be defended.

The IR35 scheme used a "sleight of hand trick" to get round the 1987 "Padmore" legislation (which itself was retrospective to the late 1940's) i.e. take the Padmore scheme and insert a "transparent" trust between the partnership and the taxpayer.

Therefore (according to Parker) the promoter and the users of the scheme should have been prepared for the same treatment i.e. retrospection.

[moira under the stairs]

i got one of those last year. it was just a reminder to make my payment on account for the current year. nothing to do with mp

Is that right !!! It listed the back payments that MP are dealing with... It did however show a different figure to what was on the CN.

[KiwiGuy]

Therefore (according to Parker) the promoter and the users of the scheme should have been prepared for the same treatment i.e. retrospection.

would have been nice that HMRC had told us from the start though instead of waiting 7 years, GL with you case i hope you get the same justice as we got

[helen7]

I have come to the conclusion that Justice Parker was correct for one simple reason which (in my humble opinion) cannot be defended.

Therefore (according to Parker) the promoter and the users of the scheme should have been prepared for the same treatment i.e. retrospection.

One simple fact remains. If HMRC had closed the scheme down when they first knew about it (2002) then NONE of us would be in this mess.

By allowing it to run for another 7 years and never challenging any returns is inexcuseable.

[DonkeyRhubarb]

I would gladly accept the same level of retrospective tax demands as the people affected by the 1987 Padmore legislation.

Where do I sign up for my Padmore comparable settlement?