- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Company Xmas Party
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by jimjamuk View Postmy point was that if you dont earn £8.5k a year then she doesnt qualify for the £150 employed allowance.....
I thought the earnings limit of 8.5k a year was only used when calculating benefit in kind if the 150 per head is breached.....
Edit: Can anyone find a link for this on HMRC website? I've hada brief look but can't see anything
Edit 2:
Found it:
As long as you stay below 150 per head per year then you're fine
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/employers-bul.../empbull15.htm
"If the cost per head exceeds £150, for a director or employee earning £8,500 a year or more the cost of the party for both the employee and their partner is subject to tax and Class 1A NICs. You would need to show it on the form P11D for the employee at section N."Last edited by r0bly0ns; 29 October 2007, 17:02.Comment
-
Cool, should be able to have a nice "event" with wife and 2 kids for under £600.
Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostI take it back, there appears to be no limit to the amount of guests, I always thought it was one guest per employee
Comment
-
It's £150 per head - doesn't matter whether that head is an employee nor not - so in the case above it's £300 [ 2 heads ].Originally posted by youngguy View PostSo I invite the Director (me) and the company secretary (unpaid person) and 2 guests and we are allowed to spend £600 on the bash?
No it's the number of heads - doesn't matter whether they are employees or not.Originally posted by r0bly0ns View PostThat depends on of the company secratery is an employee or not.
If they are not, then you are the employee and they are the guest and you can spend £300
If they are then you can each invite a guest and have £600 to spend.
No, HMRC don't say how many guests you can have - think like a business - a lot of companies will invite lots of their clients and their clients wives - so there is no limit.Originally posted by youngguy View PostBased on that, Bluebird invited 2 too many guests as he has 2 employees's and 4 guests (ration of 2 guests to 1 employee).
The only other criteria you have to meet is you have to "invite" all your employee's - which for contractors is ok as there are only usually one or two.Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
Comment
-
and don't forget if you can do it for £400 - you've only used up £100 of your £150 per head limit so you can still have another event.Originally posted by mbriody View PostCool, should be able to have a nice "event" with wife and 2 kids for under £600.
The only other thing that I did - not sure whether I needed to or not but it made sense - was to minute the event and authorise it in the monthly directors minutes.Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
Comment
-
If you go over the £150 a head, though, the whole thing becomes a BIK, not the difference.Originally posted by Bluebird View Postand don't forget if you can do it for £400 - you've only used up £100 of your £150 per head limit so you can still have another event.
The only other thing that I did - not sure whether I needed to or not but it made sense - was to minute the event and authorise it in the monthly directors minutes.Comment
-
I am assuming that you could just claim for part of the expenses associated with a company "event" ?
e.g. say you book an overnight stay in London comprising (separately paid for) train and taxi travel, hotel, theatre, meals, drinks. If it took you over £150 per head then is there anything to stop you claiming for just the hotel, meals and drinks and omitting the rest?
This obviously wouldn't work if you booked a complete "package" but otherwise how would Hector know any different?
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIf you go over the £150 a head, though, the whole thing becomes a BIK, not the difference.Last edited by gadgetman; 1 November 2007, 12:41.Comment
-
I guess that they could make a reasonable assumption that you incurred more. Otherwise, people would have a party in Barbados and only claim £150 for a couple of nights there.Originally posted by mbriody View PostI am assuming that you could just claim for part of the expenses associated with a company "event" ?
e.g. say you book an overnight stay in London comprising (separately paid for) train and taxi travel, hotel, theatre, meals, drinks. If it took you over £150 per head then is there anything to stop you claiming for just the hotel, meals and drinks and omitting the rest?
This obviously wouldn't work if you booked a complete "package" but otherwise how would Hector know any different?
There was a post earlier this year about it all, where it was asked whether you could claim a big night out while on holiday as your annual party. The general consensus was that it wasn't OK, since it would be obvious that you were there on holiday and decided to put a night out through the company.
I don't know whether Hector would "know" - does he have to know, or is it enough to suspect before it is disallowed?Comment
-
My last permie employer used to have a night and party in a hotel in Scarborough as the Christmas do.
The company paid for the hotel and party but it was made clear to all employees that they made their own way there.
For our Christmas party this year we are doing simmilar, the company is paying for an event and it is up to each atendee to make their own way there.Comment
-
Obviously I'm assuming any claims would be sensible, as per my example.
I don't think you could make any further assumptions based on a claim for hotel and meal.
I too have been on permie do's (as a contractor actually) where travel was not included.
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostI guess that they could make a reasonable assumption that you incurred more.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment