• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Applying for taper relief before April

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by mace View Post
    If that's what SJD are recommending then they'll be in serious trouble if one of their clients gets investigated by HMRC and the tax relief they acquired when closing down a previous company falls foul of the law. That would definitely be a professional misconduct charge.
    I'm not saying that that's what they recommend at all. All I'm saying is that these regulations are open to a certain amount of interpretation that which remains within the law.
    "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


    Thomas Jefferson

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
      I'm not saying that that's what they recommend at all. All I'm saying is that these regulations are open to a certain amount of interpretation that which remains within the law.
      True. But the law makes you responsible not the accountant, which means you'll end up paying should the interpretation not be in your favour. Under those circumstances, you would be sensible to complain about the advice you'd been given to the professional body governing SJD, however, if they have given you this kind of advice.

      If you want to make a few grand and hope that the tax inspector doesn't cotton on to it then that's your worry, but there was no mention that any of this was potentially unlawful in the multiple threads I've read regarding CGT taper relief since the pre-budget report came out.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by mace View Post
        .

        2. However, the ESC C16 requires you to confirm that you will not immediately re-commence trading in a similar line of business.
        year.

        so how can one get around this requirement.
        Surely one has to open another company and carry on working.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
          I'm not saying that that's what they recommend at all. All I'm saying is that these regulations are open to a certain amount of interpretation that which remains within the law.
          SJD do recommend this (or were before the budget). They have a 'bespoke report' on their website - I'll have a look for the link tomorrow.

          Comment


            #35
            Probably worth reading this

            http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/insmanual/INS9732.htm

            HMRC could consider you unfit to be a director if

            "Successive failed companies were run by the same persons with the same or near identical trading name likely to mislead people to think that one continuous business was being run.

            Phoenixism: The company was a successor to a failed company run by the same persons in the same or related trade.

            Contrived Liquidation: where a company was incorporated shortly before a first company run by the same persons in the same or related trade failed
            or

            Companies run in tandem sharing contracts, assets, employees, which were transferred to the second company in anticipation of the first company failing."

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by mace View Post
              http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/insmanual/INS9732.htm

              HMRC could consider you unfit to be a director if

              "Successive failed companies were run by the same persons with the same or near identical trading name likely to mislead people to think that one continuous business was being run.

              Phoenixism: The company was a successor to a failed company run by the same persons in the same or related trade.

              Contrived Liquidation: where a company was incorporated shortly before a first company run by the same persons in the same or related trade failed
              or

              Companies run in tandem sharing contracts, assets, employees, which were transferred to the second company in anticipation of the first company failing."
              Doesn't say anything about tax-motivated closure. This is all about failed companies or misleading names

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by mace View Post
                I'm not an accountant, so hadn't thought of it that way. I see were you guys are coming from now.

                For those who don't understand the CGT taper relief, if I'm understanding correctly, the taper relief applies from when you first bought the shares. So when you start up the company, shares are created in the company at that point. Keeping retained profit each year is similar to boosting the share price. The capital gain will be the difference between the retained profit when you sell and the nominal value paid for the shares at company startup (normally £100).

                Therefore, prior to April 2008, assuming you close the company every 3 years and make £80k in profits before tax each year

                Paying out in dividends would cost you and the company):-
                40% of £80k = £32k per year. £96k in total from £240k profits

                Retaining profits and closing company at end of year 3 would have cost:-
                20% of £240k (corporation tax) + 25% of 40% of £192k (CGT on retained profit after corporation tax) = £48k+£19.2k = £67.2k
                This means that you could save £28.8k in taxes (£9.6k per year)

                After April 2008, it will be:-
                20% of £240k (corporation tax) + 18% of £192k (CGT on retained profit after corporation tax) = £48k + £34.56k = £82.56k
                This means that you will save £13.64k in taxes (£4.547k per year)

                I've had 4 accountants since I've been running a limited company. None of them have pointed out the above before
                You're missing the fact that the tax rate is only 40% over around £40k. Do it right and you'll never break that threshold in the old capital distribution route.

                You can pay upto higher rate threshold in dividends with no addional personal tax to pay. This is better than CGT.

                Also there is a £9,200 capital gains allowance.

                So, if we assume you have £35k per year basic rate allowance, a more efficient solution is to distribute £31.5k in years 1 and 2 (remember to take into account 10% dividend credit) and then make a capital distribution of the remaining £129k. The £9,200 CGT allowance means your captial gain is around £120k. Taper relief means you only pay tax on 25% of £120k = £30k. £30k is in your basic rate allowance so you only pay 20% of this tax = £6k.

                Add the £48k CT you've paid and this gives you total tax of £54k.

                The full dividend route would be roughly 20% of £240k = £48k. Knock off 3 years of £31.5k dividend payments (£94.5k) gives a remainder of £97.5k which you would have to pay £24,375 tax. Total tax paid £72.4k.

                Post April 2008 capital distribution route would be £48k + £88.5k @ 18% = £63.9k (might as well do £31.5k dividend distribution all 3 years as CGT is 18% flat rate).

                So dividend route is £72.4k of tax

                Old capital distribution route is £54k (£18.4k saving)

                New capital distribution route is £63.9k (£8.5k saving)

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by mace View Post
                  2. However, the ESC C16 requires you to confirm that you will not immediately re-commence trading in a similar line of business.
                  I don't think that is the case.

                  Read the conditions at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ctmanual/CTM36220.htm

                  Conditions of ESCC16
                  The conditions applicable to ESCC16 are as below.

                  The company is not one which, if the distributions were made in a winding up, would be reported to the Anti-Avoidance Group (Intelligence), Clearance and Counteraction Team in respect of ICTA88/S703 under sub-paragraphs (e) or (f) of CTM36875.
                  The company is not the subject of an investigation either on its own or as part of an enquiry embracing individuals or other companies.
                  The company satisfies the Inspector that:
                  (a) it does not intend to trade or carry on business in future, and

                  (b) it intends to collect its debts, pay off its creditors in full and distribute any balance of its assets to its shareholders (or has already done so), and

                  (c) it intends to seek or accept striking off and dissolution.

                  The company and its shareholders agree that:
                  a) they will supply such information as is necessary to determine, and will pay, any CT liability on income or capital gains and any ACT liability under ICTA88/SCH13 due on distributions made prior to 6 April 1999.

                  (b) the shareholders will pay any CGT liability (or CT in the case of a corporate shareholder) in respect of any amount distributed to them in cash or otherwise as if the distributions had been made during a winding-up (see CG40430 to CG40433).

                  Comment


                    #39
                    See this first

                    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ctmanual/CTM36850.htm

                    and then point e on

                    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ctmanual/CTM36875.htm

                    Basically the upshot is that if you close down oldco and set up newco to continue the trade you are pushing your luck to expect capital treatment on the liquidation of oldco.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by THEPUMA View Post
                      See this first

                      http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ctmanual/CTM36850.htm

                      and then point e on

                      http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ctmanual/CTM36875.htm

                      Basically the upshot is that if you close down oldco and set up newco to continue the trade you are pushing your luck to expect capital treatment on the liquidation of oldco.
                      Just out of curiosity, what does open mean - I assume it's director, not shareholder.

                      If I'm director of MyCo and close it down, and then Mrs OG opens HerCo as Director with me having 2 shares and her 1 (same as MyCo), will our friends at HMRC see through it?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X