14.1 is consistent. This is not a contract between the bank and a limited company. It's a contract between a bank and an individual person ("the consultant"). Calling the consultant "he" is one giveaway; the idea that the consultant might accept "other employment" is another. As a limited company contractor, I've never seen the like and I reckon few people on this site will have either!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Update: contract received!
Collapse
X
-
-
Not necessarily. It's "The Consultant" rather than "the consultant" - I have a contract that defines "The Consultant" as the limited company; "The Personnel" as the staff employed by The Consultant to perform The Services.Originally posted by thunderlizard14.1 is consistent. This is not a contract between the bank and a limited company. It's a contract between a bank and an individual person ("the consultant"). Calling the consultant "he" is one giveaway; the idea that the consultant might accept "other employment" is another. As a limited company contractor, I've never seen the like and I reckon few people on this site will have either!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment