Back to the original point of this thread, now that the 10% lower rate band is to be abolished, the tax cost of paying the "minimum wage" will be higher due to the loss of the 10% band, making a bigger difference between paying say £5,000 or £10,000 p.a for no real benefit.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
National Minimum Wage or £97 pw?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
but surely the lower slary you pay the lower the NI contrbutions - both employer & employee ?Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
Comment
-
For an IR35 Investigation is the IR more likely to go after people who have an turnover in xs of 100k a year as they will be able to get more cash from them or are they equally as like to go for people that have a turnover of 60-70kComment
-
A private individual would think like this. I take it you have never worked with Civil Servants.Originally posted by AZZIKFor an IR35 Investigation is the IR more likely to go after people who have an turnover in xs of 100k a year as they will be able to get more cash from them or are they equally as like to go for people that have a turnover of 60-70k
I understand that there is some target driven element to their renumeration now but in my experience, a Civil Servant will put the same effort into chasing £1 of tax as they would £1000.Comment
-
I was thinking about Director's service agreement as a equivalent of employment contract where instead a word "salary" there is a word "fee"...and a fee may be small, smaller than NMW (that I read in tax advice by Indicator). They say that where in contract there is a word "fee" and you are paying e.g. 5000 per year director's "salary = fee", the taxman is less likely to argue and treat dividends as salary. The fee can be changed on board meeting. I am wondering what would be the difference, when we would insert a word "fee" in employment agreement?Originally posted by THEPUMAI was referring to a decent contract between your company and your agency/end client. If you want one of those, the PCG is probably your best bet.
They may also be able to offer you a service contract but remember that if this is in place, you are subject to the National Minimum Wage legislation.Comment
-
A late addition to this thread! Thought you might be interested to know that QDOS won't offer their TLC35 (IR35 tax loss protection) if you pay yourself less than £9,500 per year. They say they have defended many hundreds of cases and only conceded one. So they presumably know what they are talking about and there is a good reason for this salary requirement. Unfortunately I don't know what it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LewisA late addition to this thread! Thought you might be interested to know that QDOS won't offer their TLC35 (IR35 tax loss protection) if you pay yourself less than £9,500 per year. They say they have defended many hundreds of cases and only conceded one. So they presumably know what they are talking about and there is a good reason for this salary requirement. Unfortunately I don't know what it is.
Is that £9.5k gross or £9.5k net? Assuming the latter?Property advisor for the people
Comment
-
Gross. By the way, they also apply a £1000 excess to the policy for salaries less than £15K per year. So they presumably think <£10K is too risky, £10K is defendable but more risky and >£15K is fine. This is obviously just my interpretation of their rules and not their words.Originally posted by VitoIs that £9.5k gross or £9.5k net? Assuming the latter?Last edited by Lewis; 8 May 2007, 15:05.Comment
-
That's nothing to do with IR35 and everything to do with paying yourself less than minimum wage making an investigation more likely.Originally posted by LewisA late addition to this thread! Thought you might be interested to know that QDOS won't offer their TLC35 (IR35 tax loss protection) if you pay yourself less than £9,500 per year. They say they have defended many hundreds of cases and only conceded one. So they presumably know what they are talking about and there is a good reason for this salary requirement. Unfortunately I don't know what it is.
...my quagmire of greed....my cesspit of laziness and unfairness....all I am doing is sticking two fingers up at nurses, doctors and other hard working employed professionals...
Comment
-
Like I said I don't know the reason why but thought it worth a mention. I would like to pay myself £97 p/w but want tax investigation insurance more! I don't know if there is anything similar in the PCG insurance or not. Would be intersted to know.Originally posted by LockhouseThat's nothing to do with IR35 and everything to do with paying yourself less than minimum wage making an investigation more likely.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment