Hmm.. A warchest of something like £300k would see around £245k extracted versus £265k-£270kish via an MVL. If any risk can somehow be mitigated I can see the attraction if it sidesteps the 2 year MVL 'issue'. Surely a risk of it being seen as the bad kind of avoidance though...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
selling my company shares and closing shop, at least for a while
Collapse
X
-
-
But it's not an MVL - it's a sale of the company.Originally posted by eek View Post!0% of retained profits? Maslin's who post here have a company that will do it for £995+VAT Members Voluntary Liquidation | MVL Online®Comment
-
In theory this mechanism has only been needed since the advent of the anti-phoenixing rules of April 2016.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostIf it were that clever it would be standard advice that's well documented and everyone would be doing it surely?Comment
-
The TiS legislation has been around for years. The most important change in 2016 was simply to clarify the time period as being 2yrs. If you were engaged in phoenixing prior to these changes, you'd still have been in trouble. Now, we at least have a little more clarity on the time period.Originally posted by arby View PostIn theory this mechanism has only been needed since the advent of the anti-phoenixing rules of April 2016.Comment
-
Hi Fanny. Interesting hearing this is an "inTouch thing". How did they make you aware about this? I can't see anything on their website? I am currently with Nixon Williams and thinking of switching to themOriginally posted by fannyadams View PostThis sounds like the inTouch thing, although they were offering it for people with much larger reserves than 35K. I don't know the details as I decided it was outside my risk/comfort zone, but they were offering to buy for 90% of the value.Comment
-
Arby - did you go ahead with this in the end?Originally posted by arby View PostIn theory this mechanism has only been needed since the advent of the anti-phoenixing rules of April 2016.Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Today 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10

Comment