So SNAW is ok with telling us that he broke a collar bone in Canada a few years ago on a public site which probably gets a good few million hits a year, but is upset that the NHS wants to put it on a central encrypted server only accessible to UK trained health care professionals when he seeks treatment?
FFS, do you know how stupid that sounds?
Actually, yeah I'm fine with it. I volunteered that information quite freely. Nothng dumb about it at all. Not quite sure how that supports your argument.
If some company, or indeed the government,is prepared to go to the trouble of trawling this website to collate information on me, then what makes you think they wouldn't go to the same trouble to collate information on me via centralised databases?
And essentially it's a privacy issue. I might well put up info about breaking a collarbone snowboarding, but equally there are many things which I would never put out in the public domain about my personal life, but which I would have no choice about in going into a centralised database. It's called choice, or lack of.
And btw, we're not just talking about an NHS databases now, and please FFS leave off the trained health professional garbage, we're not that naive and I worked for an NHS trust many years ago and know exactly who you're talking about.
I don't want the government collecting the volume of info they're collecting on me. I don't trust them to safeguard it. I don't trust them, or future governments, or public bodies or individuals in those bodies not to abuse it, lose it, sell it, or just be plain incompetent with it (And how much does it cost and for what real benefit I might add).