Originally posted by Cliphead
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Go, Suity!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Yep, Suity he's got a point. It's great that you want to do things in a professional manner but it's alll dependent on the context. If clientco wants things done quick and dirty and knows the risks of doing that then that's what has to be done. As long as he knows the risk he's taking of course. It's their company and their money they're risking, not yours.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Got the phone number?Originally posted by d000hg View PostAn IB in Jersey? Sounds fishy to me, some offshore tax evasion outfit.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
His new colleagues Jimmy Carr, Lester Piggot & Ken Dodd said there's absolutely nothing wrong with it.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostGot the phone number?What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
-
-
Suity, do it their way and send them an invoice.
That is all.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
ftfyOriginally posted by minestrone View Post"If I can't write a 54 page spec I'm going home!!"
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Like this you mean?Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostHe's more of a man than you, you crossing dressing nonce.
Last edited by Scrag Meister; 27 November 2013, 11:14.Never has a man been heard to say on his death bed that he wishes he'd spent more time in the office.Comment
-
At least we know now where MF's professional name 'Mollybags' originates from.Originally posted by Scrag Meister View PostLike this you mean?

The Lollipop Man
Various Artists - The Mother of all Morris
Chorus: trad. Verses: © Jim Causley, Paul Wilson & Marilyn Tucker 2007
Oh the lollipop man has a great big stick
And all that he charges is a penny a lick
And he gets it out whenever he can
He’s a dirty old devil is the lollipop man
Who is this with his spurty spout?
A dribbly cone, you can suck it all out
And a knicker-knocker glory, it’s the ice-cream man
But he cannot hold a candle to the lollipop man
Who is this with his grimy sack?
You can have it up the front or he’ll shove it round the back
With his sooty old nuts it’s the dirty coalman
But he’ll never hold a candle to the lollipop man
Who is this with his long stiff brush?
He rams it up the flu with a shove and a push
And he doesn’t give a toss; he’s the chimney sweep man
But he’ll never hold a candle to the lollipop man
And who is this with his floppy mop?
It’s long and it’s wet with a foam on top
Well he’s squeaky clean; it’s the window cleaner man
But he’ll never hold a candle to the lollipop man
Who is this with a silver top?
It’s nothing that a little blue-tit can’t pop
With his manly jugs it’s the creamy milkman
But he cannot hold a candle to the lollipop man
And who is this with his petticoats gay?
Powder puff and curly wig and lingerie
Well it’s old Mollybags, neither woman nor a man
But she’ll never hold a candle to the lollipop man
Who is this taking down your draws?
He never ever shoots and he seldom scores
Well it’s never jackpot with the Littlewoods man
And he’ll never hold a candle to the lollipop man
Who is this with the long bent fruit?
He peels back the skin and he slips on his suit
Well his real name’s Eric, he’s Banana Man
But he’ll never hold a candle to the lollipop man
Comment
-
Thanks for the feedback. It is noted. Especially MTT.
Had some feedback from ClientCo. They were a bit quiet yesterday when I passed across the change requests. These have now been approved, and comments passed on the high quality. I have written test plans today and I'm all ready to begin the build.
I was thanked for my hard work and told to keep doing it this way as they recognise this is a significant improvement on the way things had been done in the past.
That said, it was always a bit of a coin toss. I understand it is their money and systems they are risking, but it would also be my reputation, wouldn't it?
For example, you do sloppy work as you just meekly accept this is the way things are done, it goes to pot, how do you defend against that? I cut corners as requested, pointed out the risks, they took them and it's all their fault?
For me, and the way I operate as a business I am a consultant. I am paid well to do good work, and offer advice and consultancy where it is wanted. In this case there was nothing, nada, so I quietly and quickly have put a simple process and a couple of templates into practice. Done without rubbing their noses in it. Now this is the norm. For me I feel good about doing this, and I feel personally rewarded for my efforts as I have quickly established some respect.
The set up is weird, there's the agency, the consultancy, a third party provider and the client. I am there as MeCo, operating with zero backup in a bear pit, so I think I am right to be cautious.
Sorry if this doesn't fit in the the more laissez-faire of you (not getting on at Mitch or Cliphead as I get what they are saying) but it is how I work.
Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment