I despise the idiots who get on trains with bikes, they smell bad and take up loads of space. Then they moan if you push past them while they take 10 mins to alight the train. Either take the train or cycle.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cyclists
Collapse
X
-
-
its not just cyclists, nearly took out 2 joggers and a dog the other night, both wearing black with a black labrador running with the flow of traffic.
I always tell my kids if your gonna walk/run down the road always be on the side facing the oncoming traffic because you can then see whats coming towards you rather than behind,
"I find common sense is not that common"Comment
-
In Cloggers safety gear or lighting doesn't seem to be an option.
Though thankfully in some cities they have cycle paths so you don't have to deal with cyling loons.
Except in Amsterdam where i am convinced that most of the cyclists there have a death wish and you really have to be aware of them.Comment
-
There is a road like that in Bermondsey.Originally posted by zeitghostComment
-
Me too. Also used the much bigger (and heavier) stacked ones. AB in "when IT used to be a mans game" mode.Originally posted by zeitghostI used to use those back in the day.Just saying like.
where there's chaos, there's cash !
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong!
Lowering the tone since 1963Comment
-
Cyclists who dress in black, wear earphones and have no lights are a tiny minority Shirley?
Must be a London thing.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
I wear reflective gear, no earphones and have lights. Quite a few drivers only just miss me. So what is the point?Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostCyclists who dress in black, wear earphones and have no lights are a tiny minority Shirley?
Must be a London thing.Comment
-
Yes but they are aiming for you, GJ was trying to missOriginally posted by BrilloPad View PostI wear reflective gear, no earphones and have lights. Quite a few drivers only just miss me. So what is the point?
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Never worn a safety helmet myself and had considered them a bit sissy, but having not thought about the physics, but having seen it in action, the argument for them becomes more compelling. Turns out that when hit from behind, the angular momentum of the cyclist and the forward momentum of the car are a perfect storm for sending a cyclists head thumping into a car windscreen. Or in simple terms the lower body is swept away and the car crashes into his head which is heading for the floor and not travelling horizontally as fast as the car. Presumably pedestrians meet a similar fate. People on mobile phones are my pet hate though.Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by zeitghost12 gauge pump?
Nope.Originally posted by Paddy View Post

Spot on.Originally posted by Support Monkey View Postits not just cyclists, nearly took out 2 joggers and a dog the other night, both wearing black with a black labrador running with the flow of traffic.
I always tell my kids if your gonna walk/run down the road always be on the side facing the oncoming traffic because you can then see whats coming towards you rather than behind,
"I find common sense is not that common"
Nope. It's not a 'London' thing (I live in Dorset.), it's a 'moron' thing (they're everywhere).Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostCyclists who dress in black, wear earphones and have no lights are a tiny minority Shirley?
Must be a London thing.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Today 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Yesterday 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42


Comment