Reputation

[Zippy]

Wahey!!! Well done team we have a new one.

Below 'slower than a 486' is 'is probably on the bench'

Thanks Gricer. I'm assuming thats -100. Taken one for the board. Well done son. :clapping:

It goes down to -3000 apparently. There is some way to go yet

 

[d000hg]

Bizarrely I have to click on the star only once to get the little dialog, but if I'm not able to re-rate the first click does nothing, only on the 2nd do I get the "spread it about a bit" message.

 

[Peoplesoft bloke]

Right. Got all the emoticons back on the right hand side. Predictably it was my fault (I think) I probably changed to basic editor when I was trying to read and post on here using my old Nokia E71. Thanks for all the Reputations folks - they are about evenly matched between pos and neg so I haven't really moved. Considering I never even noticed they existed until today that seems like a good result.

 

[NickFitz]

Bizarrely I have to click on the star only once to get the little dialog, but if I'm not able to re-rate the first click does nothing, only on the 2nd do I get the "spread it about a bit" message.

Duly noted. I've already sorted out quite a few bugs in the rep system, but that one hadn't been brought to my attention before. I'll prod it and see if it quivers, shimmies, or shakes

Thinking about it, I vaguely remember noticing what looked like an anomalous flow of control in the (frankly amateurish) JavaScript responsible for such matters. Rather than prodding, it may be time to say bollocks to the vBulletin mob and hit it with the Hammer of Competence

EDIT: No, I'm wrong: it looks like they managed to **** that up server-side. I'm still bringing the hammer to bear though

 

[MarillionFan]

Any particular reason some anonymous coward down-rated me for pointing out a bug in the system? Loser.

Easy to narrow down. Negs count half. So a 10k poster negs -5

Just work it out

 

[TimberWolf]

Easy to narrow down. Negs count half. So a 10k poster negs -5

Just work it out

Is there a formula for calculating the full positive rep? It sounds from what you say that it will be a linear relationship of the form rep = k * postcount

Where k is the number required.

 

[EternalOptimist]

Any particular reason some anonymous coward down-rated me for pointing out a bug in the system? Loser.

why dont you hit CUK with a FOI request, then sue the dirty swine who negged you

for defamation of thingy

 

[d000hg]

for defamation of thingy

You seem to know an awful lot about what that cowardly custard said to me.

 

[Zippy]

Is there a formula for calculating the full positive rep? It sounds from what you say that it will be a linear relationship of the form rep = k * postcount

Where k is the number required.

No, it also depends on the reputation of the repper and how long they have been on the board.

 

[EternalOptimist]

You seem to know an awful lot about what that cowardly custard said to me.

im just the comedian,
tell you what. you cant rep someone in quick succession, so i'll do you now, just so you know the first one wasnt me