Don't know about Ruby, but Python is every bit as horrible as Javascript.
What we should be using is ECMAScript4, which is Javascript with classes (basically the same as ActionScript 2, although that's not important). Which makes it a pretty decent object oriented language akin to C# or Java, but manages to be mostly backwards compatible.
It's really sad that with all the wave of hype about HTML5 being used for serious applications, that we're still stuck with this numptie scripting language.
now I know you haven't a clue.New clientco has a system that is heavily dependent on Javascript. I've done some very basic stuff before but can anyone recommend a decent online website, book or videos to learn from?
I'd recommend Mozilla Developer Network.
I find it useful but I'm sure Nick will be along soon to tell me why they're terrible![]()

JS and webby stuff may be in vogue but is ugly and there are a gazillion code-monkeys out there who can do it. It's the one area I've always stayed away from where possible.
Perhaps re-read his post and you'll spot he never suggested any similarity except they were both crap.Python is nothing like Javascript, have you ever programmed using it?
Javascript is pretty powerful as a language but its limitation is that it runs on the browser.
It looks extremely similar to JavaScript (which it pre-dates) - in fact, most of the example code snippets on the Wikipedia page would be valid JS with the addition of nothing more than ()s, {}s and ;s and would function identically, particularly the ones relating to closures and lambdas.
Or you can just run JS outside the browser anyway. Though it seems a weird choice to me.