And you're claiming the moral highground after allegedly being insulted?
Are you drunk?
Sick of being personally insulted by AtW - possibly.

Sick of being personally insulted by AtW - possibly.
Ok, I've missed that then. Link?
Nope, I thought I'd have a go at posting something that some people may enjoy playing with hence the title of the post.
AtW decided to be a twat and spoil it.
I'll give you just one hint (free of charge):
---------
inc di
inc di
dec cx
---------
is better be:
---------
inc di
dec cx
inc di
---------
And another one:
je 137
jmp 11E
^^^^^^^
Making absolute jumps to predefined addresses and asking people to change source code that would inevitably change offsets is rather mean.
And FFS stop programming in 16-bit DOS mode - time to move on!
![]()
Recalculating manually absolute addresses is not exercise for brains - maybe only to weed out those who would actually cave in to this task and accept it as norm, a bit like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7ebfrcv4tc
Your code is sure very poor performance wise, maybe intentionally but in any case when you ask people to optimise assembly you need to say which CPU you are targeting.
btw, no debug command on Win XP 64 bit![]()

Ok, I've missed that then. Link?
For an ex-Royal Marine you are a bit of a coward - run away you big girls blouse!
![]()
AtW the armchair warrior strikes again

That's rich.AtW the armchair warrior strikes again
It was your personal insults I objected to. So, less than 50 bytes or you'll leave the forum, this should be good.
