Originally posted by RedSauce
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Smug again
Collapse
X
-
-
I don't think the extra stuff is necessarily untrue to Tolkien, it's just not in the book. I believe (although it's been a long time since I read it) that there's stuff about the Necromancer etc in the appendices and possibly in some other sources.Originally posted by original PM View PostI sort of agree - the Hobbit was 1 book and LOTR was 3 - so why is the Hobbit not 1 film while LOTR was 3??
well yes Money but why pad it out with sh*t not true to the book
oh yeah money - I get it...
:sigh:Comment
-
I had a big issue with the Goblintown bits.
It seems like they cut corners and rushed through some parts of the story there, then extended and drew out less important bits. I can't remember the details, only my annoyance at the time.
I was annoyed by stupid little changes too, like having Bilbo lose his buttons in the corridor, rather than when squeezing through the door, just so that they could put a little action sequence in... what a load of bollocks.Comment
-
Surely it's less of surprise when you are on your own.Originally posted by Bunk View PostYou mean cutting a hole in the bottom of the box?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Saw it last night. The first one, I was relieved when it ended; with this one, I was sorry it ended. I found it much more entertaining and engaging than the first one.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
The first one was a load of bull jizz.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
There's no need to be anal about it.Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe first one was a load of bull jizz.Comment
-
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
i thought it was great once i'd let go of being precious about the book. (bilbo losing his ring, bombur not getting a dunking, kili falling for an elf maiden, all the running about under the mountain etc.) still, the second half was terrific.Comment
-
The stuff about Azog was what annoyed me most about the last one. Trying to set up some great good vs evil battle that just wasn't there in the book and is superfluous to the story. I did enjoy the film to an extent, but it was marred by the unnecessary changes.Originally posted by Bunk View PostI don't think the extra stuff is necessarily untrue to Tolkien, it's just not in the book. I believe (although it's been a long time since I read it) that there's stuff about the Necromancer etc in the appendices and possibly in some other sources.
You can't let go of being precious about the book! Sounds like I am going to be really peed off when I watch the next one if they make that many changesOriginally posted by DS23 View Posti thought it was great once i'd let go of being precious about the book. (bilbo losing his ring, bombur not getting a dunking, kili falling for an elf maiden, all the running about under the mountain etc.) still, the second half was terrific.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30




Comment