Whose sockie is MF, no one really experiences this much fail surely
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Systems down!
Collapse
X
-
-
Sack Test Monkey who signed off the Exit ReportOriginally posted by mudskipper View PostDon't you have a change control doc? Who signed off the testing?
Sack Release Monkey who failed to do due diligence
Sack Change Monkey who failed interrogate the work of the aboveOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
But first sack the product owner who didn't check what any of the, was signing offOriginally posted by SimonMac View PostSack Test Monkey who signed off the Exit Report
Sack Release Monkey who failed to do due diligence
Sack Change Monkey who failed interrogate the work of the above
Eek in its just MF's attempt to escape now rather than later modemerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Is it salesforce?Originally posted by minestrone View PostHawd on...
The forms fields have variable names and they are correct but it is the on screen text labels beside the fields are wrong and that is killing the system?
Jesus ****!merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I wish I could publish the email trail I have, it's absolutely fantastic. They've now found the route cause and it's classic schoolboy error.
It starts with a screenshot of my comments on the original story saying 'NB. Check the label / field change does not cause an integration problem'
Then a number 'about 20' emails back and forth with an ever increasing number of people (now 20) chipping in, pointing out a possible solution.
Eventually it was found that on system A as well as renaming the labels they made the column name similar, do similar the integration code picked up the new field name instead of the other. Of course after lots of finger pointing and an ever increasing number of 'I disagree with the last email' they've now come to the conclusion it was nobodies fault and a problem with the platform. The solution to add -new- in the name of the new field as opposed to making it identical to the old one.
FFS this is route 1 schoolboy error. Makes me laugh though.
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
what they couldn't speill? Its Roots of a tree!Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostI wish I could publish the email trail I have, it's absolutely fantastic. They've now found the routeot cause and it's classic schoolboy error.
well at least you come out smelling of roses. Well done, always send the CYA mail eh?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment