Originally posted by proggy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Interviews
Collapse
X
-
Hate to grate your ingrained fairness gene, but sadly, it appears to be the way we humans operate in the real world.If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers. -
I imagine the correct answer would be "Demand 40% of the take or I go to the boss?"Originally posted by amcdonald View PostMy first job my soon to be boss asked what I would do if I caught her defrauding the organisation. For an internal audit job it was not a joke, or a trick questionComment
-
Nope anything along the lines of with regret report your concerns to a higher authority. Though I did wonder if she was on the take at the interview.Originally posted by bless 'em all View PostI imagine the correct answer would be "Demand 40% of the take or I go to the boss?"Doing the needful since 1827Comment
-
I was once asked to gather evidence to catch a co-worker who was a thief, so I would probably relate my experience of that.Originally posted by amcdonald View PostNope anything along the lines of with regret report your concerns to a higher authority.
Have to be absolutely sure of the facts, double check, don't throw false accusations around etc.
So did you get the gig or not and was the rate what you wanted?Originally posted by amcdonald View PostThough I did wonder if she was on the take at the interview.
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Short for sock puppet, it even has it's own Wiki entryOriginally posted by proggy View PostWhat is a sockie?
A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term—a reference to the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock—originally referred to a false identity assumed by a member of an internet community who spoke to, or about himself while pretending to be another person.[1] The term now includes other uses of misleading online identities, such as those created to praise, defend or support a third party or organization,[2] or to circumvent a suspension or ban from a website. A significant difference between the use of a pseudonym[3] and the creation of a sockpuppet is that the sockpuppet poses as an independent third-party unaffiliated with the puppeteer. Many online communities have a policy of blocking sockpuppets.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
If any of those charges are leveled at me, then they should be leveled at everyone here. I have not lied or deceived anyone about who I am.Originally posted by Sysman View PostShort for sock puppet, it even has it's own Wiki entryComment
-
+1 Proggy is not a sockie. He is a one account person (.... Russell,LatteLiberal, Proggy) until the account is banned and he joins again.Originally posted by proggy View PostIf any of those charges are leveled at me, then they should be leveled at everyone here. I have not lied or deceived anyone about who I am.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View Post+1 Proggy is not a sockie. He is a one account person (.... Russell,LatteLiberal, Proggy) until the account is banned and he joins again.
Comment
-
Ooh. a bit touchy on that subject are we?Originally posted by proggy View PostIf any of those charges are leveled at me, then they should be leveled at everyone here. I have not lied or deceived anyone about who I am.
I was not accusing you of that.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Only once been asked to do a second round interview - but by then I'd accepted another gig - wouldn't have done one anyway as I figure if they can't decide on the basis of one meeting then they are either too nervous collectively to make a decision or just fannying around wasting everyone's time - either one is not a company I'd enjoy working withOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostI find second rounds harder when you had to actually do some digging to find out about them.How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Today 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Yesterday 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Comment