Missing thread

[ctdctd]

You hae corrected an error on my part, but you hane failed to answer the main point of my post.
1. we have all read the T's and C's
2. we have mostly ignored them
so when exactly do the T&C get ignored?

Chill Zippy - it's just the Internet, dude

[Zippy]

Chill Zippy - it's just the Internet, dude

I can't help it - sorry.

[realityhack]

Zippy, I can't imagine a CUK with a strict and exhaustive set of rules, that were enforced with zero tolerance. I certainly wouldn't want to be a part of it.

NAT summed it up really well with:

The problem with publishing "the rules" is that they are, quite deliberately, not exhaustive. The problem with having a set of rules is that it doesn't allow any flexibility - and there are always individuals who will behave really badly "within the rules", and then cry foul. Conversely, there are times when breaching a written rule doesn't really require any intervention.

Let's not take this whole thing too seriously eh? SY isn't permabanned. It'll probably do him some good.

[Zippy]

Careful Zippy. Don't mess with the mods......

Ah. If only I (and the DOJ) had kept up the Latin studies

[Gonzo]

I would point out that the deletion of the "MF is a big girl" thread seems to go against the assertion that "It is against our policy to delete threads after they have replies, so do not ask us to delete threads once they have attracted attention" but I don't really want to get dragged into this unseemly brawl, so I won't

It may, or may not, have something to do with a certain former poster who, IIRC, demanded admin delete their id and everything that they had ever posted when they flounced, to use the modern vernacular. This was not something that admin was going to comply with.

[Gonzo]

You hae corrected an error on my part, but you hane failed to answer the main point of my post.
1. we have all read the T's and C's
2. we have mostly ignored them
so when exactly do the T&C get ignored?

Let it go Zips. You are starting to sound the same as all the others do just before they flounce or go postal and get banned.

If I were you I would judge whether your posting is generally acceptable or unacceptable based on the number of infractions that you have received for your 10,000 or so posts. How many infractions is it?

EDIT: 13,000 or so posts. I have read every one of them, honest.

[Zippy]

Let it go Zips. You are starting to sound the same as all the others do just before they flounce or go postal and get banned.

If I were you I would judge whether your posting is generally acceptable or unacceptable based on the number of infractions that you have received for your 10,000 or so posts. How many is it?

One.

[Gonzo]

One.

Nothing to worry about then.

[Zippy]

Nothing to worry about then.

Aye, probably not you old f***er

[Gonzo]

Aye, probably not you old f***er

How dare you!

I am not old.