6 mins 57 seconds...

[AtW]

It wasn't very nice, though.

It (Drewster) has been exposed as a sockpuppet, consequently rules don't apply to him as he is allegedly not a person

[shaunbhoy]

It wasn't very nice, though.

No point highlighting AtW misdemeanours Faq. He is in the "inner circle", albeit only in the same sort of way that some Guards' regiments keep a goat as a mascot.

[AtW]

some Guards' regiments keep a goat as a mascot.

Calling someone goat is an insult in Russian!

[TheFaQQer]

No point highlighting AtW misdemeanours Faq. He is in the "inner circle", albeit only in the same sort of way that some Guards' regiments keep a goat as a mascot.

But that would imply that the moderators play favourites, which (of course!) we know to be untrue.

[EternalOptimist]

i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,
i can not believe I read through all this,

[shaunbhoy]

Calling someone goat is an insult in Russian!

How extraordinary. Being called Russian is an insult to a goat.....unless they have special needs of course.

[Drewster]

Look, I'll try to explain it to you in simple terms.

1. I asked FAQQer specifically whether he is bitter - I quoted his message and used words like "Are you" - not "Is anyone on this forum" bitter - this question was directed to him specifically.

2. You quoted my post and answered it that you ARE bitter.

Now, I am prepared to withdraw my accusation of you being a sockie - you are too stupid to pull it off, I give you that - however you'd have to admit that you are stupid in order for me to settle this case with you.

Now what shall it be Mr FAQQER?

OK lets try this

Look, I'll try to explain it to you in simple terms.

I refer the Honourable Gentleman to my previous response

I apologise I should have added/started with a comment such as "I don't know about FAQ but I am " to make it clearer for you!

and my other previous response:

The trouble is my foreign friend is that you didn't actually ask a private question... Its debatable if you actually asked a question at all but we'll leave that.

You posted in a public/open thread which means any/everybody can read it and respond to it not just the person who you "thought" you addressed it to/at.... Sorry mate!

If thats not simple or clear enough for you try this:
This is a PUBLIC forum which means ANYONE can reply to any post.
If you want to ask a SPECIFIC poster a PRIVATE question you should PM him/her. Because you are obviously so thick you don't understand I will explain than PM stands for PRIVATE Message.

Do you get it? Do you understand? Is it clear for you now?

In my first response I apologised and conceded I could have made it clearer for you (because you are obviously as dense as Pig Tulip)
In my second response I apologised again but explained that your question wasn't private.

In this post I offer no apologies at all because you are acting like a Twunt of the first order.

[AtW]

In this post I offer no apologies at all because you are acting like a Twunt of the first order.

First is not the highest, I must try better!!!

[MarillionFan]

So in summary, Drewster is a sockpuppet of Faqqer and is therefore unimportant? Right?

Well thats fine, I'd been ignoring Drewster from the beginning anyway because I don't understand VB. OK!

[TheFaQQer]

OK lets try this

I refer the Honourable Gentleman to my previous response

and my other previous response:


If thats not simple or clear enough for you try this:
This is a PUBLIC forum which means ANYONE can reply to any post.
If you want to ask a SPECIFIC poster a PRIVATE question you should PM him/her. Because you are obviously so thick you don't understand I will explain than PM stands for PRIVATE Message.

Do you get it? Do you understand? Is it clear for you now?

In my first response I apologised and conceded I could have made it clearer for you (because you are obviously as dense as Pig Tulip)
In my second response I apologised again but explained that your question wasn't private.

In this post I offer no apologies at all because you are acting like a Twunt of the first order.

I'd like to remind you of CUK rule number two:

2. Be nice to each other - no personal attacks on other users.