• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

6 mins 57 seconds...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    What is this thread about? Can't even be @rsed to read the title. Anyway, Dame Judi Dench has just opened a squirrel enclosure:

    http://www.thisissussex.co.uk/eastgr...l/article.html
    I'd like to remind you of CUK rule number 4:

    4. Do not stray from the discussion topic.
    Granted, in the case of many threads started by AtW, that may not be possible.
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      Granted, in the case of many threads started by AtW, that may not be possible.
      You are about to violate unwritten rule #8.

      Comment


        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Right assertion but wrong conclusion - the fact that he has been conclusively proven to be a sockpuppet means that in theory you can't break any rules by being mean to it as it is not real human.

        Run Drewster, run!
        Could you please explain the logical leap of:
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        .....fact that he has been conclusively proven to be a sockpuppet...........
        and
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Run Drewster, run!
        Shirley a Sockpuppet
        a) Can't run
        b) Has no need to run

        I could also question your definition of "conclusive proof"... which appears to be "I (AtW) said it"

        Comment


          Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
          I'd like to remind you of CUK rule number 4:



          Granted, in the case of many threads started by AtW, that may not be possible.
          I didn't realise there were rules
          ǝןqqıʍ

          Comment


            Originally posted by Drewster View Post
            I could also question your definition of "conclusive proof"... which appears to be "I (AtW) said it"
            Look Mr FAQQER, give it up - we caught you red handed, throw this one away and get a new sockie - it's no longer amusing.

            Comment


              Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
              I didn't realise there were rules
              There isn't for us Sockies!!

              Comment


                Originally posted by Drewster View Post
                There isn't for us Sockies!!
                Yes, you are outside the rules

                Comment


                  Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
                  I didn't realise there were rules
                  No really??? Colour me surprised!

                  But luckily they dont apply to you!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    Yes, you are outside the rules
                    Need I remind you - you topped the vote of Sockies.......

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by tay View Post
                      No really??? Colour me surprised!

                      But luckily they dont apply to you!
                      Aww, let's see if some of my special-ness will rub off on you
                      ǝןqqıʍ

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X