• Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The experts thread

www.datemymates.co.uk

This group's active leader is jonathan
Looking For : We are a group of boys looking for girls
Likes : hmm, powerade, fosters twist, MCFC, Braodway FC, Ham and Pineapple Pizzas,green tea, peep show, boy kill boy, The Smiths, Stone Roses, Abi from the Zutons, ladies, The Brickhouse, Curb your enthusiasm, and any thing or person who can makes us laugh.
Dislikes : Eamon Holmes, The welsh guy off BBC news, the rain, people posting porn on this site!
Most Likely to Say : 'Thats how I roll these days'
Group Sexuality : Straight
Average Age : 25
Average Size : 3"
Ah! leader of the pack eh!

So How about some free and easy chick Phone numbers ?
 
Last edited: 23:23
Well, I was trying to think what subject(s) I could consider myself an expert upon.

Then I started to wonder what exactly defines an expert, and how many degrees of knowledge do you need to possess to be considered an expert in a particular subject.

It gets even trickier when you begin to consider that degrees of knowledge fluctuate even within a given subject, eg, I could be really good at maths, but poor at algebrae, yet algebra is a maths subject. Therefore would that justify someone as being an expert, even if some of the associated knowledge was below par ?

Then I wondered about acquired knowledge as opposed to academical knowledge, and whether levels of either was required to be classified "an expert".

And then, consider this. I don't consider myself an expert on Board Games. I would consider someone who has played every board game invented, written multiple books and designed their own board games as someone approaching expert level.

Yet, compared to a Kalahari tribesman, who has never played a board game, I would be an expert on boardgames, because I have over 100 now. So, you see, "expert" is a fairly meaningless term, since it is so contextual.

And then I thought...flip it.

I know what I know, and I know what I don't know, and that's good enough for me.

....Of course, there are some things that I know I don't know I know, and some things that I know but don't know I know well, or know but don't want to know so..pffff.
 

Interesting that he claims to run a successful dating site, yet allocates space at the very top of the homepage to Google ads for other dating sites, thereby encouraging people to head straight off to his competitors.

I assume his definition of "successful" is "makes me a few quid off AdSense" :rolleyes:

Sample Google ad:

Dating For Parents
Meet 1000s of single parents online Safe, fun and free to join!
www.DatingforParents.com​

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited: 02:11
Well, I was trying to think what subject(s) I could consider myself an expert upon.

Then I started to wonder what exactly defines an expert, and how many degrees of knowledge do you need to possess to be considered an expert in a particular subject.

It gets even trickier when you begin to consider that degrees of knowledge fluctuate even within a given subject, eg, I could be really good at maths, but poor at algebrae, yet algebra is a maths subject. Therefore would that justify someone as being an expert, even if some of the associated knowledge was below par ?

Someone, strolling along, chatting with John von Neumann, asked him how much maths he knew. He stopped, went into one of his odd trances for a few seconds, answered '28%', and then carried on walking.
 

Advertisers

Back
Top