- Thanks received
- 645
I did think some high earners or people with massive windfalls could negotiate their tax rather than stump up the whole amount in an attempt to reduce aggressive avoidance and get some money in the coffers rather than move it all somewhere and get nothing. Could be wrong there though. Kind of makes sense if it's not badly abused but you can bet your bottom dollar Joe Public won't like it. Something like I'll pay you a million to leave me alone else I'm gonna off shore it and you'll get squat type approach.
People are ignoring the minor detail that his UK income is from his position as an MP and his top-up salary for being a Prime Minister living in No 10. that's not a stupidly high income stream and 22%, assuming stuff like pensions contributions and other allowances, is not that unrealistic. His US income is taxed in America, not in the UK.
With a wife with her own moderately good income ( ! ) and no doubt he has some tax-paid savings from his former career, he has zero need* to faff around with tax minimisation schemes as long as he is in government. Once he is no longer in government, he will join all the others overpaid nonentities on the gravy train, and may then pay a bit more attention to it..
* Waiting for our tame Guardianistas to say that of course he is, it's what they do...
. To which you can of course respond with "Look at St Keir's personal position and pension arrangements". 
Last edited:
12:48