- Thanks received
- 1,182
DimPrawn said:The true cost of code is the support and enhancement.
Unmaintable "write only" code might make you feel big and clever, but it costs companies a fortune when you have left.
The simplest code is the code that costs a company the least money.
DimPrawn said:If companies sacked their "star" coders, the ones who sit alone and never communicate, the ones "well I'm a coding genius", the ones "I once wrote a chess AI engine in 400 bytes" types, and hired communicators, they'd slash their IT budgets in half.
![]()
DimPrawn said:If companies sacked their "star" coders, the ones who sit alone and never communicate, the ones "well I'm a coding genius", the ones "I once wrote a chess AI engine in 400 bytes" types, and hired communicators, they'd slash their IT budgets in half.
![]()

DimPrawn said:You've not been in the IT industry long have you?
![]()
DimPrawn said:9 months in the lifetime of a large-scale product or project is nothing.
How much money does it cost if you build the system to the wrong requirements, or "super coders" are just left to produce something only the "super coders" can understand, and all the "super coders" have left.
You are left with a product or project that costs 10x the dev costs to maintain, support, enhance and re-develop.
Your fired!
DimPrawn in Alan Sugar mode.![]()
Diestl said:This sounds increasingly like someone who has only read books about developing systems with no real experience. Or one of those "Lets have 10 meetings about this line of code and why we should change it." guys.
DimPrawn said:9 months in the lifetime of a large-scale product or project is nothing.
![]()