• Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tact

Lucy

Super poster
Thanks received
3
Today I'm reviewing a document produced by one of the 'big4'.

What a load of b*llocks.

I'm able to provide a detailed assessment of what they are saying, and what is missing, or just completely wrong. However, I'm struggling with how to tactfully say it is a load of tulipe, as tact is not my strong point, I know you've probably not noticed. :D

Any clues ?
 
factually detail what they are saying
factually detail what is missing
factually detail what is wrong

Describing it as tulipe is expressing your own view on the matter. Leave that bit out.

HTH
 
Lucy said:
Today I'm reviewing a document produced by one of the 'big4'.

What a load of b*llocks.

I'm able to provide a detailed assessment of what they are saying, and what is missing, or just completely wrong. However, I'm struggling with how to tactfully say it is a load of tulipe, as tact is not my strong point, I know you've probably not noticed. :D

Any clues ?

It's probably recycled from another job. In fact knowing which of the Big4 you're referring to, I'm almost certain of it. Probably produced by an FTV muppet who hadn't even seen the end client, did a few "find and replace's" and submitted. Just come back with a whole load of questions, they were probably hoping you wouldn't spot their ineptitude.
 
Mordac said:
It's probably recycled from another job. In fact knowing which of the Big4 you're referring to, I'm almost certain of it. Probably produced by an FTV muppet who hadn't even seen the end client, did a few "find and replace's" and submitted. Just come back with a whole load of questions, they were probably hoping you wouldn't spot their ineptitude.


Cheers Mordy, yes, I am sure this is the case. I am just struggling with how pathetic it is. The muppet is charged at £2k a day, and leaves promptly at 5pm to pick-up the sprog.

I'm pretty much there in terms of the factual review, and I suppose my opinion can be it is 'inadequate' nicely...
 
Mordac said:
It's probably recycled from another job.

That's standard practice across all industries, why think of something new when something that will pass as acceptable already exists
 
Quit moaning and get on with it.

HTH

Oh, sorry this was a thread about tact :D
 
Last edited: 14:46
Lucy said:
Today I'm reviewing a document produced by one of the 'big4'.

What a load of b*llocks.

I'm able to provide a detailed assessment of what they are saying, and what is missing, or just completely wrong. However, I'm struggling with how to tactfully say it is a load of tulipe, as tact is not my strong point, I know you've probably not noticed. :D

Any clues ?

Hint: Copy and paste some phases into Google. See if there are match. I’ve found that most crapus docus are plagiarised snippets off the net.
 
Paddy said:
Hint: Copy and paste some phases into Google. See if there are match. I’ve found that most crapus docus are plagiarised snippets off the net.


Thanks Paddy, what a good (and scary) idea.

HTF do I tell PM is this is the case :eek:
 
Lucy said:
Thanks Paddy, what a good (and scary) idea.

HTF do I tell PM is this is the case :eek:

How about "Do you realise that x% of this document can be found on the internet using Google?"

Oh FFS!
 

Advertisers

Back
Top