Flouncing

[woohoo]

Well said.
The world doesn't revolve around me, I know that.

As for handing out infractions and shutting down opinions, if some feel I need to apologise for banning a poster who joked about raping female members of this forum, then you need to re-evaluate the people you think are "good" and the people you think are the most evil members of society.

Well you didnt ban the female poster for saying another male member was pro rape. So lack of consistency is a problem but as I said it's a difficult job, especially with people that push the boundaries, you ****.

[minestrone]

As for handing out infractions and shutting down opinions, if some feel I need to apologise for banning a poster who joked about raping female members of this forum, then you need to re-evaluate the people you think are "good" and the people you think are the most evil members of society.

That paragraph right there is all the evidence why you should not be moderating.

Pretty disgusting you would sink to that level.

[WTFH]

Well you didnt ban the female poster for saying another male member was pro rape. So lack of consistency is a problem but as I said it's a difficult job, especially with people that push the boundaries, you ****.

If it got reported, it would get looked at, I can't remember seeing a post saying that.

[WTFH]

That paragraph right there is all the evidence why you should not be moderating.

Pretty disgusting you would sink to that level.

You think it's disgusting that I sank to the level of banning a long-time poster for that?
You think that me banning someone for being so offensive is evidence why I shouldn't be moderating?

[minestrone]

You think it's disgusting that I sank to the level of banning a long-time poster for that?
You think that me banning someone for being so offensive is evidence why I shouldn't be moderating?

Don't be deliberately obtuse. You are suggesting that we are supporting that poster's remarks when we claim you can't do your job.

Everyone accepts there is a standard. what the issue is that you and others are banning people for disagreeing with you.

As I said before I didn't even know you before becoming a mod, you didn't have enough personality or debating skills to become a name on here and you have used the power granted on you to make up for that.

[NotAllThere]

... the issue is that you and others are banning people for disagreeing with you.

Ah, that old chestnut. Got any evidence to support that claim? I'd be fascinated to see it.

[northernladuk]

Ah, that old chestnut. Got any evidence to support that claim? I'd be fascinated to see it.

But if he doesn't agree with it he'll ban you

[minestrone]

Ah, that old chestnut. Got any evidence to support that claim? I'd be fascinated to see it.

https://forums.contractoruk.com/gene...ml#post1849316

[MarillionFan]

You think it's disgusting that I sank to the level of banning a long-time poster for that?
You think that me banning someone for being so offensive is evidence why I shouldn't be moderating?

What? You can't threaten to rape people on an anonymous web forum anymore?!?!?!?!

Jesus. I'll have to rethink my next insult for Eek then.

[woohoo]

If it got reported, it would get looked at, I can't remember seeing a post saying that.

Yup it was reported. Sorry didn't mean to come off as a dick - you can't win as a mod, too harsh too lenient.