Originally posted by Yorkie62
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dynamic alignment
Collapse
X
-
-
Compared to the betwetting liberal snowflakes majority on here anyone would be right wing.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostFTFY.
However since you have allocated me a stereotype here are a few things I actually believe in.
Our infrastructure should be, and needs to be, under central government control, but the individuals assigned to run the individual pieces of national infrastructure must be able to be held accountable, in the same way a board of directors is accountable to its shareholders.
We need to sort out the NHS. Its problems are not just money related. It needs a thorough rework and systems analysis performing before more money is allocated. yes this will cost money be the savings will far outweigh the costs in the end.
We, as a country need to regain control from the liberal bleeding hearts and snowflakes wrt what does and what does not constitute a "Hate Crime". You lot need to get over yourselves, get your head out of your backside and grow a pair.
With that in mind our police on the street need to get back to basic policing and the punishment needs to fit the crime committed. Yes this does mean "an eye for an eye", etc. The problem today is that individuals genuinely believe they will not get caught. Why do kids carry knives. Because the other kid carries a knife and has never been caught, and if is does get caught he is told that he is a naughty boy and must not do it again. The punishment simply does not fit the crime. Make criminals understand that they will get caught and the punishment will be severe.Comment
-
As you're a law and order sort, you must be a big supporter of the #metoo movement.Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostCompared to the betwetting liberal snowflakes majority on here anyone would be right wing.
However since you have allocated me a stereotype here are a few things I actually believe in.
Our infrastructure should be, and needs to be, under central government control, but the individuals assigned to run the individual pieces of national infrastructure must be able to be held accountable, in the same way a board of directors is accountable to its shareholders.
We need to sort out the NHS. Its problems are not just money related. It needs a thorough rework and systems analysis performing before more money is allocated. yes this will cost money be the savings will far outweigh the costs in the end.
We, as a country need to regain control from the liberal bleeding hearts and snowflakes wrt what does and what does not constitute a "Hate Crime". You lot need to get over yourselves, get your head out of your backside and grow a pair.
With that in mind our police on the street need to get back to basic policing and the punishment needs to fit the crime committed. Yes this does mean "an eye for an eye", etc. The problem today is that individuals genuinely believe they will not get caught. Why do kids carry knives. Because the other kid carries a knife and has never been caught, and if is does get caught he is told that he is a naughty boy and must not do it again. The punishment simply does not fit the crime. Make criminals understand that they will get caught and the punishment will be severe.Comment
-
So are the SNP racists, hiding behind the word 'national' in their party name or not?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostWhat I said was sufficient for anyone who can follow a logical argument.
Or to put it in 'set' terms;
Are
'SNP' ∈ Racists, or
'SNP' ∉ Racists
?
NB. The 'etc' in the post by WTFH.Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
"ZFC has been criticized both for being excessively strong and for being excessively weak, as well as for its failure to capture objects such as proper classes and the universal set"Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostI'm not sure he could cope with
Zermelo–Fraenkel.
Are you sure you want to use it in the first place?Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
I also didn’t use the word “rule”.Originally posted by Bean View PostNB. The 'etc' in the post by WTFH.
Anyway, must go now and goosestep towards the National Trust, since those who used the word “rule” have interpreted and argued based on what was not said originally.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Who was it who claimed it was a rule?
Was it this post:
Or was it this one:Originally posted by WTFH View PostRacists will frequently use “National” in their party description to make it sound like they are just proud of their country and hide the fact that they are racists.
“National Socialist”
“National Front”
“British National Party”
Etc.
Originally posted by Bean View PostWhy not include - Scottish National Party - or is this the exception to your rule?
…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
-
That is a fair question. The answer is no. The SNP sits within the tradition of national liberation and independence movements, so that is the context within which the word 'National' is inserted within the party name. The BNP is a fascist and racist party so the context is different.Originally posted by Bean View PostSo are the SNP racists, hiding behind the word 'national' in their party name or not?Comment
-
You're being too literal and strict;Originally posted by WTFH View PostI also didn’t use the word “rule”.
Anyway, must go now and goosestep towards the National Trust, since those who used the word “rule” have interpreted and argued based on what was not said originally.
Exception that proves the rule - Wikipedia
Your original claim was about racists was it not?
NB. Racist ≠ Nazis
HTH BIDIOriginally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment