can anyone please tell me what is point of case sensitivity in SQL Server? It is not something I have seen a lot of in my doings but today I had to port some Netik sql stored procedures to another installation of netik. The Sql instance here is case sensitve and I found my netik procedures failed because case sensitivity is not addressed in the procedures themselves.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Case Sensitvity
Collapse
X
-
-
SQL Server is a database which is storing many pieces of text in its doings. Capitalisation of a word can be changing its meaning in its doings in the English language or some other languages. For instancings, The words ‘dawn’ and ‘Dawn’ are having different meanings indeed, one referring to the early morning and the other to a person of female type.Originally posted by Swati View Postcan anyone please tell me what is point of case sensitivity in SQL Server? It is not something I have seen a lot of in my doings but today I had to port some Netik sql stored procedures to another installation of netik. The Sql instance here is case sensitve and I found my netik procedures failed because case sensitivity is not addressed in the procedures themselves.
It is therefore of some utility and importance that a database supports case sensitivity in all of its doings including its coding doings; it is good to maintain consistency in all doings of database, including code, as code can be stored as text in DB tables.
Hope that is helping in your doings.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
But a key with a cracking set of Bristols. Something that Yale, in all their years of lockmaking have never managed, so respec' due.Originally posted by zeitghostThough it must be observed that she, rather than being a conventional hu-man female, was actually A Key.
HTHComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment