- Thanks received
- 182
If all you need to do is to encrypt data between two nodes using https then I suggest you research TLS and certificates. Not sure your exact requirements but most web servers such as IIS, Apache, nginx, etc support TLS. If you are using a broker such as RabbitMQ this supports TLS too.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security
https://www.rabbitmq.com/ssl.html
Feel free to PM me if you need more info.
Thanks much appreciated!
In terms of what they want - they have no idea - KPMG have come in and said here are your GDPR gaps and so they are saying they need it. (note it is not even a GDPR gap as nowhere does GDPR insist on having encrypted messages within a firewall network)
But they do not really know what benefit it actually gives as they are just box ticking moron's.
Cheers for that - when I spoke to our network guys they started banging on about security in the application - but I guess there are two things to consider
1) The application talking to the database.
2) The application talking to another application.
Can you approach both of these in the same way or do they need to be considered differently?
Woo hoo.
So we have done our 'encrypting data at rest' bit of work.
And now we are being told to 'encrypt data in transit'.
Unsurprisingly I am getting a lot of different answer non of which make sense.
So lest assume we want to encrypt a web service - so it needs to be sent as an https message rather than http - I am being told we need to encrypt that somewhere in the application.
However my understand was that it is just a mode of transport for the message - so i could send the same message via either http or https but the one which goes via https is 'more secure' and 'more difficult for someone to intercept and read' than the one going via http.
Appreciate this is a large topic but can anyone shed any light on this?
![]()