- Thanks received
- 1,186
riposte
maybe she was being subtle and saying all the posts seem the same to her?
I've been having a think about the thread in which "munter" in the title got changed to "punter" by someone in authority.
Whilst munter may not be the most wonderful expression, after a huge amount of consideration, I think it's a flaming liberty to go mucking around with a thread title like that.
I've been posting on here since 2007, never had a ban or a warning, never had a sockie (really I haven't) - and this is the first time anything like this has come up - so maybe I have a ban coming (from this thread). If so, ban away, I don't want to post on a forum that thinks they can and should censor a word like munter, however regrettable and sad an expression that may be.

I've been having a think about the thread in which "munter" in the title got changed to "punter" by someone in authority.
Whilst munter may not be the most wonderful expression, after a huge amount of consideration, I think it's a flaming liberty to go mucking around with a thread title like that.
I've been posting on here since 2007, never had a ban or a warning, never had a sockie (really I haven't) - and this is the first time anything like this has come up - so maybe I have a ban coming (from this thread). If so, ban away, I don't want to post on a forum that thinks they can and should censor a word like munter, however regrettable and sad an expression that may be.
You should probably allow it to quietly get forgotten.
I think you may be missing the ******* point. I don't want it to be quietly forgotten. Everyone has a point at which they think something's gone too far. This one is mine. I was hoping I wouldn't be backed into this, but you and Cojak are ******* mountebanks.
Happy now?
6/10, but if you want to see misogyny done properly, try the Max Clifford thread.
You don't what what quietly forgotten?I think you may be missing the ******* point. I don't want it to be quietly forgotten. ...