Originally posted by Gittins Gal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Eek!
Collapse
X
-
Please do.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishing -
Comment
-
They could have done much better if:Originally posted by cojak View PostThat guy's an arse.
The EA have had the greatest success ever this winter. The surge last year was actually greater than the 1953 surge which lost many lives as well as homes. The floods this winter caught far fewer homes than the floods of July 2007, despite the rain being much worse.
The water has to go somewhere, if it doesn't catch you it will catch the mugs further downstream.
- they hadn't cut 550 flood prevention, warning and recovery jobs in December "with the intention of protecting frontline services concerned with flooding"
- in 2007, under Labour, the EA missed its target of keeping just 63% of England's flood defences up to scratch
- they were then told it cost 150 million a year to reach this target
- since the coalition they have in fact spent less on flood defences and a 6% overall fall in funding for 2011-2015 was in a briefing paper
- in 2012, 120 million was announced after it was found 294 flood defence schemes never received any funding they were promised
- as funding hasn't come up to 2010 levels a new scheme has been hatched: 'Flood and Coastal Resilience Partnership Funding' which is basically a PFI but private investors are not particularly interested
- by 2015 it is expected that only 38 million will be raised from these sources and the funders are firms who want to develop on flood plains
- however the via the taxpayer funded 'Growing Places Fund' extra cash can be allocated but this fund is specifically for infrastructure so really the only way to get flood defence funding is to build yet more on land at risk of flooding
The EA have known about these problems for a long time but have turned pretty much a blind eye...
Just saw this: http://www.theguardian.com/environme...funding-scheme“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Today 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02

Comment