- Thanks received
- 161
Exactly, implying that if she's not a 'real woman' and she's not a fatty, then she's underweight, which she clearly isn't.
I know you didn't mean it that way now - just saying why I originally called her 'normal'.
To be fair, she's 17; lots of 17 year olds are naturally thin and once she's in her 20s she might will fill out. It's simply that I don't find that thinness attractive and I didn't when I was 17 either. I always preferred the hockey girls with their firm buttocks and jiggly wiggly brea... I'm being naughty now aren't I?