However, I have never perceived those messages as rude, because I always assumed that your "perfectly reasoned arguments" were in fact satirical and parodic, and that your messages concerning the "bringing of facts" merely served as approbation of such assumptions.
As any post-modernist theorist of literary criticism will tell you, "il n'y a pas de hors-texte"; therefore my interpretation of what you said, and of what you then further said, cannot be wrong, or indeed "right" in the sense of being right, any more than your interpretation of what I said can be right, or indeed "wrong" in the sense of being wrong. And
vice versa.
In fact, according to post-modernist literary critical theory, we can all say any old bollocks and it's entirely up to anybody else who feels like it to decide for themselves what to make of it.
Which is nice