- Thanks received
- 767
NAT, Thank you for the clarification. I agree (mostly) with what you say.
However, 'he's refused to cooperate' is not strictly true, is it ? I've made no reference to that from the day you sent that PM until two days ago. A fair amount of elapsed time, while others (who remain blisfully unbanned) continued to do it.
If you think putting someone on ignore is a solution to your and Cojak's eratic moderation, then I'm happy to do that for you![]()
It's you isn't it? You've had an operation turning you into an old woman.






