I've seemed to upset the administrators. Please can someone provide clarification and a definition of a 'Bob'. With this info, I'll ensure future posts do not cause offense.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bobs
Collapse
X
-
-
You could search and find out for yourself, you are a contractor, the internet is your friend.Originally posted by keninparis View PostI've seemed to upset the administrators. Please can someone provide clarification and a definition of a 'Bob'. With this info, I'll ensure future posts do not cause offense.
HTHFiscal nomad it's legal. -
What do you possibly think could be wrong with your own definition and we'll see if it requires correcting?Originally posted by keninparis View PostI've seemed to upset the administrators. Please can someone provide clarification and a definition of a 'Bob'. With this info, I'll ensure future posts do not cause offense.Comment
-
Which one?Originally posted by keninparis View PostI've seemed to upset the administrators. Please can someone provide clarification and a definition of a 'Bob'. With this info, I'll ensure future posts do not cause offense.
Bob Marley
Bob Dylan
Bob Segar
Bob the builder
Sponge Bob
Bob of plenty cheapness
'Saint' Bob Geldof
Bob Dinero
Bob Hope
Bob Downey Jr
amongst many moreComment
-
Originally posted by keninparis View PostI've seemed to upset the administrators. Please can someone provide clarification and a definition of a 'Bob'. With this info, I'll ensure future posts do not cause offense.
offence - unless you are a septic
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I 2nd that motion. I've read a few of his posts and he's up to mischief.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBetter still, why not just **** off?Comment
-
Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Today 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30
- Napkin, anyone, for your next IT contract? Sep 9 06:11
- 52 contractors told us what they think of Andy Burnham. Basically: not much, yet. Sep 8 06:02


Comment