• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Tatchell Again

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Now there's an interesting question isn't it?

    Or bisexual?
    I would have thought there were many more people potentially not 'completely' straight, than there are potential paedophiles. Hopefully that's not wishful thinking
    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
    +5 Xeno Cool Points

    Comment


      #12
      FFS whats a Knickerbocker Glory?
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by sasguru View Post
        FFS whats a Knickerbocker Glory?
        It's a kind of ice cream sundae. Some people reckon it's better than sex.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by doodab View Post
          It's a kind of ice cream sundae. Ugly people reckon it's better than sex.


          FTFY
          Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
          +5 Xeno Cool Points

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
            I would have thought there were many more people potentially not 'completely' straight, than there are potential paedophiles. Hopefully that's not wishful thinking
            The first one is probably pretty cut and dry and there is a lot of research to back it up.

            The second one is a hot potato. Partially thats what the article was discussing. I think concerning the concept of paedophilia would have to be split between prepubescent and pubescent.

            I warrant there isn't a guy on this site who hasn't clocked a fit bird at distance when driving a car, turned to look and realised they're too young and quickly looked away!!!
            What happens in General, stays in General.
            You know what they say about assumptions!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
              The first one is probably pretty cut and dry and there is a lot of research to back it up.

              The second one is a hot potato. Partially thats what the article was discussing. I think concerning the concept of paedophilia would have to be split between prepubescent and pubescent.

              I warrant there isn't a guy on this site who hasn't clocked a fit bird at distance when driving a car, turned to look and realised they're too young and quickly looked away!!!
              Absolutely. It's about intent I guess.

              A guy I used to know very well is now on the sex offenders list for looking at very bad internet sites with young children on them. This caused a rift between a few mutual friends, a couple of whom felt that as he hadn't been proven to 'act' on anything he'd seen, it was no worse than viewing anything else online. Others felt that (the issue of condoning the abuse aside) it was completely unacceptable and deviant behaviour. It doesn't make him a paedophile, but it makes him (hopefully) unusual.
              Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
              +5 Xeno Cool Points

              Comment


                #17
                These things always get turned around, is he promoting homosexuality or just seeking equal acceptance?

                Morals are a nonsense as they imply rigidity and too many tend to be founded on nothing or on instincts we no longer need to apply.

                Start with what we know we want, the desires nature gave us. Those are pretty much expressed by the US thing of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Seek to deliver those things to the maximum number of people by practical means. As far as I'm concerned that means individual freedom unless there is a good reason in the public interest to limit it.

                PS I'm talking about gays not paedophiles.
                bloggoth

                If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
                John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                  I warrant there isn't a guy on this site who hasn't clocked a fit bird at distance when driving a car, turned to look and realised they're too young and quickly looked away!!!
                  It's a complicated matter, not made easier by the objectification of young women in the media.

                  Natalie Portman in Star Wars = legally acceptable in a lot of places

                  Natalie Portman in Leon = you're on the register
                  While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                  Comment


                    #19
                    A bloke in work was kicking off about how terrible it was that Elton John had male dancers dressed as scouts (this is going back 12 years). Sexploitation of the child and all that. The week before he was telling the office how great it was that the Stranglers used to tour with female dancers dressed as school girls.

                    He did not take kindly to the young graduate making a fool out of him in front if his peers.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                      I think concerning the concept of paedophilia would have to be split between prepubescent and pubescent.
                      by its very definition it would have to only be applicable to pre-puberty
                      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X