a pretty unique concept of 'brilliant'. how difficult might it be to produce the diatribes?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Mods
Collapse
X
-
-
And some posters claimed I was HHHOriginally posted by The Lone GunmanHe was brilliant, constant diatribe of outrageously racist or otherwise offensive stuff. He appeared in a number of guises and managed about 20 posts per id before being removed, and usualy all the threads he contributed to went with him......what a guy.
Autom...Sprow...Canna...Tik banna...Sandwol...But no sera smeeComment
-
I meant he was brilliant entertainment value. HHH spoting was good sport, getting a post on one of his threads was a challenge.Originally posted by scotspinea pretty unique concept of 'brilliant'. how difficult might it be to produce the diatribes?I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
But don't forget the REAL reason he was always getting banned...He paid £88 to CUK to form his LTD CO. They f**ked it up every step of the way and he openly critisised them via the forum. That was the REAL reason.Comment
-
Welcome back...!Originally posted by TwoJagsBut don't forget the REAL reason he was always getting banned...He paid £88 to CUK to form his LTD CO. They f**ked it up every step of the way and he openly critisised them via the forum. That was the REAL reason.Oh Jesus - Disaster Management Ltd.
You know you'll need us!Comment
-
Originally posted by The Lone Gunmanand he never delivered with the picks of that blonde bird either.
He got that b*tch on video eventually.Comment
-
You mean his threads were a series of conversations with himself under multiple names?Originally posted by The Lone GunmanI meant he was brilliant entertainment value. HHH spoting was good sport, getting a post on one of his threads was a challenge.Autom...Sprow...Canna...Tik banna...Sandwol...But no sera smeeComment
-
It was Threaded all along!Originally posted by WageSlaveYou mean his threads were a series of conversations with himself under multiple names?Oh Jesus - Disaster Management Ltd.
You know you'll need us!Comment
-
Comment
-
Put it this way, if he got a bit of a suntan on holiday and then caught a glimpse of himself in the mirror, he'd end up brawling with himself in the gutter.Originally posted by WageSlaveYou mean his threads were a series of conversations with himself under multiple names?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment