- Thanks received
- 4
I don't think there is so much blame here. The lappy was stolen from their premises. I know it was a lappy and therefore likely to be taken away, but give em some cred.
BTW: How many of our erstwhile contributors may be detailed in that data?
What I meant was that other data loss has been due to sticks, discs and lappies being transported here and there with no concern for security, some even left unattended.Depends on whether they bothered to lock the office doors and windows, lock the lappy(s) away out of sight, why they had the data on it on the first place rather than accessing it from the central server etc etc etc.
Not really enough detail in the article to blame or exhonerate them.
What I meant was that other data loss has been due to sticks, discs and lappies being transported here and there with no concern for security, some even left unattended.
This was lost due to a criminal act.
I agree with that and what DaveB says, but the implication in the reporting oh never mind.................. mutter stamp........mutter.Data protection, at Government level, should surely be burglar-proof? That's what encryption is there for.
The Adventure Game: superb!
