Indeed, I see there are some new posts in LR that may not last long. I think someone is going for a banning record.Old Greg said:I ought to save my response for LR.
realityhack said:Kind've asked for it with that thread title. This is like IRC all over again. I still think it'd be amusing to have a ban reason - eg:
Kyajae
Banned: Loon.![]()
What?DS23 said:uh oh.
I enjoyed those - they help me get to sleep.zeitghost said:It must have been my fascinating posts in TPD about TRF radios that dun it...![]()
zeitghost said:It must have been my fascinating posts in TPD about TRF radios that dun it...![]()
alreadypacked said:and the last, Kyajae Banned![]()
Zapico said:Banned for this thread or banned for other threads? I cannot see anything that explains why a ban has taken place. This thing isn't healthy. Perhaps the moderators are beyond questioning or under duress from elswhere, yes?
Zapico said:Banned for this thread or banned for other threads? I cannot see anything that explains why a ban has taken place. This thing isn't healthy. Perhaps the moderators are beyond questioning or under duress from elswhere, yes?
If it's the banned for this thread, I can then understand the British mentality. Same happened to Walter Wolfgang for commenting "rubbish" at Jack Straw at a New Labour party conference in 2005. Was he not arrested under anti terrorism laws too for his behavior?
Can it be that the thread title was designed to provoke debate but the moderators took the some other view as the "bait". Perhaps I will be banned too, yes? for questioning this.