- Thanks received
- 1
So what you're saying is that 640k is not enough for some jobs?AtW said:I know you are trying to be funny, but what you should consider is that when you deals with objects number of which exceeds billions, or even trillions in some cases it means that if you don't keep them in memory you will have at least a fixed cost of a disk seek - that applies to cases when you can't access data sequentially of course - this means that performance becomes seriosly limited by disk: even if you talk about sequential access it is still good 2 orders of magnitude slower than accessing same data in RAM.
PS in all the languages in all the countries in all the world, there aren't 100 million words.

