Mind bleach needed

[LondonManc]

Could be named because he's cleared of being a bit rapey and he's "only" a homewrecker. Mind you, unless he works for WWF, you'd have to question his motives in the first place.

[d000hg]

Awful. So what about this innocent fellas children?

Maybe he shouldn't have had sex with her.

[BrilloPad]

Otherwise we end up with secret trials and the like, which isn't conducive to justice, and justice seeing to be done.

The family courts are totally secretive.

Which is how the courts can send a tipstaff to break down the bedroom door of a 13 year old child who refused to live with his mother.

[meridian]

Maybe he shouldn't have had sex with her.

Crikey, another one where you don't read.

According to the story in the link (and that's all we've got to go on) he didn't have sex with her, she forced herself on him and gave him a blowjob.

If anything it should be the man charging her with rape, but apparently men can't be raped by women.

[GlenW]

Could be named because he's cleared of being a bit rapey and he's "only" a homewrecker. Mind you, unless he works for WWF, you'd have to question his motives in the first place.

WWF? Is she a wrestler?

[LucidDementia]

WWF? Is she a wrestler?

Showing your age there

[LondonManc]

WWF? Is she a wrestler?

No and I don't want to see her box either.

[fullyautomatix]

I think the way it works is, the woman is always the victim and if during a trial she is found to be not the victim, she can just go home.

[vetran]

I think the way it works is, the woman is always the victim and if during a trial she is found to be not the victim, she can just go home.

I think anyone she has sex with is a Victim.